• Doctor
  • GP practice

Hyde Park Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Woodsley Road, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS6 1SG (0113) 200 1090

Provided and run by:
Hyde Park Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Hyde Park Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Hyde Park Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

20 December 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Hyde Park Surgery on 20 December 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

29 November 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Hyde Park Surgery on 29 November 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • We saw that one member of staff had been employed without references having been obtained prior to appointment.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • In the most recent patient satisfaction survey, 100% of patients said they had confidence and trust in the last GP they saw compared to the CCG average of 97% and the national average of 95%.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • The practice was open 8am to 8pm Monday to Friday. In addition patients were able to access appointments on Saturday and Sunday between 8am and 4pm, delivered via a reciprocal local ‘hub’ arrangement. Appointments could be booked up to three months in advance. In addition appointments were available on the day for those patients with more urgent needs.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by GP partners and management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
  • The practice provided evidence to show that they had reduced opioid prescribing by 10% within a four month period supported by the West Yorkshire ‘Campaign to Reduce Opioid Prescribing’ (CROP) project.

However the provider should:

  • Review their recruitment processes and take steps to obtain appropriate references for all staff before appointment.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice