• Doctor
  • GP practice

Esplanade Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Esplanade Surgery, 19 The Esplanade, Ryde, Isle of Wight, PO33 2EH (01983) 618388

Provided and run by:
Esplanade Surgery

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 10 January 2018

The Esplanade Surgery is situated at 19 The Esplanade, Ryde, Isle of Wight, PO33 2EH.

www.theesplanadesurgery.co.uk

The practice has six GP partners. Three of the partners are male and three of the partners are female. The practice has approximately 10,000 patients registered with it, although this increases during the holiday season.

The practice has a higher number of male patients in the 45 to 49 year age group and 65-69 year age group when compared with the England average. There is also a higher proportion of female aged 65-69 years in the practice population.

The provider has opted out of providing out of hours services, which are provided by the out of hours GPs at St Mary’s Hospital via the 111 service.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 10 January 2018

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection March 2015 – Good)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Esplanade Surgery on Wednesday 22 November 2017 as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence based guidelines.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.
  • The practice employs a practice pharmacist who had exceeded all the tasks set by the practice, for example significant events have been reduced in relation to prescribing errors and hypnotic prescribing in the over 75yrs age group have been reduced by 51%.
  • The practice had two members of staff who were trained in British Sign Language.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

Review risk assessments in relation to Legionella to identify all risks associated with their premises and manage these risks.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

People with long term conditions

Good

Updated 30 July 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of people with long-term conditions. Nursing staff had lead roles in chronic disease management and patients at risk of hospital admission were identified as a priority. Longer appointments and home visits were available when needed. All these patients had a named GP and a structured annual review to check that their health and medicine needs were being met. For those people with the most complex needs, the named GP worked with relevant health and care professionals to deliver a multidisciplinary package of care.

Families, children and young people

Good

Updated 30 July 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of families, children and young people. There were systems in place to identify and follow up children living in disadvantaged circumstances and who were at risk. For example, children and young people who had a high number of A&E attendances. The practice offered a full range of childhood immunisations in line with national guidance. Children and young people were treated in an age-appropriate way and were recognised as individuals, and we saw evidence to confirm this. Appointments were available outside of school hours and the premises were suitable for children and babies. We saw good examples of joint working with midwives, health visitors and school nurses.

Older people

Good

Updated 30 July 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of older people. Nationally reported data showed that outcomes for patients were good for conditions commonly found in older people. The practice offered proactive, personalised care to meet the needs of the older people in its population and had a range of enhanced services, for example, patients deemed at risk were on proactive care programmes. It was responsive to the needs of older people, and offered home visits and rapid access appointments for those with enhanced needs. The practice worked with a Care Navigator who was a trained professional able to access social support and provide advice on areas such as support networks and benefit entitlement.

Working age people (including those recently retired and students)

Good

Updated 30 July 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of working-age people (including those recently retired and students). The needs of the working age population, those recently retired and students had been identified and the practice had adjusted the services it offered to ensure these were accessible, flexible and offered continuity of care. The practice was proactive in offering online services as well as a full range of health promotion and screening that reflects the needs for this age group. Extended hours surgeries were offered every alternate Monday and Wednesday and on two Saturday mornings a month.

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)

Good

Updated 30 July 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia). The practice regularly worked with multi-disciplinary teams in the case management of people experiencing poor mental health, including those with dementia. It carried out advance care planning for patients with dementia.

The practice had signposted patients experiencing poor mental health to access various support groups and voluntary organisations. It had a system in place to follow up patients who had attended accident and emergency (A&E) where they may have been experiencing poor mental health.

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable

Good

Updated 30 July 2015

The practice is rated as good for the care of people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. The practice held a register of patients living in vulnerable circumstances including homeless people, travellers and those with a learning disability and offered longer appointments for people within this population group.

The practice regularly worked with multi-disciplinary teams in the case management of vulnerable people. It had told vulnerable patients about how to access various support groups and voluntary organisations. Staff knew how to recognise signs of abuse in vulnerable adults and children. Staff were aware of their responsibilities regarding information sharing, documentation of safeguarding concerns and how to contact relevant agencies in normal working hours and out of hours.