The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Westcroft House Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

66 Main Street, Egremont, Cumbria, CA22 2DB (01946) 820348

Provided and run by:
Westcroft House Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Westcroft House Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Westcroft House Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

10 December 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Westcroft House Surgery on 10 December 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

11 Dec 2018

During a routine inspection

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous rating November 2015 – Good)

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Westcroft House Surgery on 11 December 2018 as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • There was a focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

We saw some areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice had focused on improving their care of patients with diabetes. This led to 72% of diabetic patients having a care plan in place and 55% achieving one or more of their health goals. This was a marked increase from 16% of diabetic patients having a care plan in 2011, and none achieving their goals. The practice also focused on prevention, identifying 686 patients at risk of developing the condition and referring them to a programme promoting health eating and exercise. Of the 686 at-risk patients, only 70 subsequently developed diabetes.
  • The practice had identified 6% of their practice list as carers. They had a carers’ lead who supported them.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

17 November 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Westcroft House Surgery on 17 November 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice