Tadcaster Medical Centre

On this page

• Overview
• Assessing needs
• Delivering evidence-based care and treatment
• How staff, teams and services work together
• Supporting people to live healthier lives
• Monitoring and improving outcomes
• Consent to care and treatment

We looked for evidence staff involved people in decisions about their care and treatment and provided them with advice and support. Staff regularly reviewed people’s care and worked with other services to achieve this. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating remains the same.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

We did not look at Assessing needs during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

We did not look at Delivering evidence-based care and treatment during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

We did not look at How staff, teams and services work together during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

The service supported people to manage their health and wellbeing to maximise their independence, choice and control. The service supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support.

The service was able to signpost patients to a social prescriber who were able to provide services to help people access services within the community such as food banks, a talk and walk service as well as things such as citizens advice.

Staff focussed on identifying risks to people’s health, including those in the last 12 months of their lives and those with caring responsibilities. Staff supported national priorities and initiatives to improve population health, including stopping smoking and tackling obesity.

The service routinely monitored people’s care and treatment to continuously improve it. They ensured outcomes were positive, consistent and met the expectations of people themselves.

The service had consistently met the World Health Organisation target of 95% for the uptake of childhood immunisations. The latest available data showed that the practice had achieved over 95% uptake for all 5 categories of childhood immunisations.

The service performed better than the England average in relation to several cancer screening programmes, including screening for breast, bowel and cervical cancer. For example, the practice rate for breast screening was 83.4% compared with the national average of 70%. Similarly, they had an 81.1% uptake for bowel screening compared with the national average of 72%. For cervical screening the target is 80% and in the 25 to 49 year old age group they had achieved 82.8% and in the 50 to 64 year old age group they had achieved 84.9%.

We did not look at Consent to care and treatment during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.