• Doctor
  • GP practice

Drs Dawes, Narasimhan and Spiller

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Ridgeway Surgery, 175 The Ridgeway, Sedgley, Dudley, West Midlands, DY3 3UH (01902) 886500

Provided and run by:
Drs Dawes, Narasimhan and Spiller

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 2 March 2026 to 5 March 2026. Ridgeway Surgery is a GP practice and delivers service to 11989 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that 90.28% of patients are White, 4.51% Asian, 2.03% Black, 2.52% Mixed and 0.65% Other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 5th decile (5 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly and processes were in place to ensure learning was shared with all the team to mitigate future risks. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. Effective processes for the recruitment of staff were in place to ensure all the appropriate checks had been completed prior to commencing employment. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion; all the staff we spoke with demonstrated a genuine commitment to providing the highest level of care to practice population. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. Feedback received via the National GP Patient Survey was overwhelmingly positive regarding patient experience.

The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. Feedback from patients was positive about accessing the services provided and this was also reflected in the results of the GP National Patient Survey. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. There were effective governance processes and systems in place to identify, manage and mitigate risks. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

17 May 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Ridgeway Surgery on 17 May 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There were comprehensive records in place to the support the practices arrangements for identifying, recording and managing risks. The practice was proactive in identifying and managing significant events. All opportunities for learning from internal and external incidents were maximised.
  • We observed the premises to be visibly clean and tidy. The practice offered a range of clinical services which included care for long term conditions and services were planned and delivered to take into account the needs of different patient groups to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.
  • Throughout our inspection we noticed a strong theme of positive feedback from staff. Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • There was a systematic approach to working with other organisations to improve patient care and outcomes. The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems, processes and practices in place to keep people safe and safeguarded from abuse.
  • The practice had a clear vision which had quality and safety as its top priority. We observed a strong patient-centred culture and we saw that staff treated patients with kindness and respect, and maintained confidentiality.
  • The practice had an effective programme of continuous clinical and internal audits. The audits demonstrated quality improvement and improvements to patient care and treatment.
  • All patients who were registered with the practice had a named GP and patients could access appointments and services in a way and at a time that suited them.
  • The practice implemented suggestions for improvements and made changes to the way it delivered services as a consequence of feedback from patients and from the patient participation group.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice