• Doctor
  • GP practice

Linkway Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Lyng Centre For Health & Social Care, Frank Fisher Way, West Bromwich, West Midlands, B70 7AW (0121) 553 4000

Provided and run by:
Linkway Medical Practice

Important: The provider of this service has requested a review of one or more of the ratings.

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 22 May 2026 to 27 May 2026. Linkway Medical Practice is a GP practice and delivers service to 13689 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that 47.60% of patients are White, 34.22% Asian, 8.97% Black, 5.28% Other and 3.93% Mixed. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 2nd decile (2 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

SAFE: The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly and processes were in place to ensure learning was shared with all the team to mitigate future risks. People were protected and kept safe. Staff managed the majority of medicines well, but improvements were needed to ensure safety alerts were acted on to mitigate potential risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. Effective processes for the recruitment of staff were in place to ensure all the appropriate checks had been completed prior to commencing employment. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received regular appraisals, however we found gaps in staff training updates.

EFFECTIVE: People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

CARING: People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The service supported staff wellbeing.

RESPONSIVE: The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. Feedback from patients was mostly positive about accessing the services provided however this was not reflected in the results of the GP National Patient Survey for access. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

WELL-LED: Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. There were some effective governance processes and systems in place to identify, manage and mitigate risks, however these required further strengthening to ensure all risks were mitigated. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

3 October, 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Linkway Medical Practice on 3 October 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Staff understood their responsibilities to raise concerns and to report incidents and near misses. The practice had a formal system in place for the ongoing monitoring of significant events, incidents and accidents.
  • Arrangements were in place to ensure that risks to staff and patients were assessed and managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
  • The practice had completed some clinical and administrative audits but there was no programme of internal audits in place to monitor quality and make improvements.
  • The practice invested in staff development and training.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by the management.
  • The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

There were areas of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • Ensure all patients on repeat medications receive regular reviews.
  • Improve the signage offering a chaperone service to patients.
  • Implement a programme of internal audits that monitor safety and drives improvement within the practice.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice