• Doctor
  • GP practice

Greens Norton Medical Centre Also known as Greens Norton and Weedon Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Towcester Road, Greens Norton, Towcester, Northamptonshire, NN12 8BL (01327) 358287

Provided and run by:
Greens Norton and Weedon Medical Practice

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Greens Norton Medical Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Greens Norton Medical Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

25 April 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced inspection at Greens Norton and Weedon Medical Practice on 25 April 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.

The key questions are rated as:

Safe - Good

Effective - Good

Caring - Good

Responsive - Good

Well-led - Good

Following our previous inspection on 22 January 2020, the practice was rated Good overall and Good for providing Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led services. The practice was rated as Requires Improvement for providing Safe services.

From the inspection on 22 January 2020, the practice was told they must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Greens Norton and Weedon Medical Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a focused follow-up inspection to follow up on the Requires Improvement rating for safe at the last inspection in January 2020. The practice was found to be in breach of Regulation 12 of the Health & Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. A requirement notice was issued to the provider under Regulation 12: Safe Care and Treatment due to the area of non-compliance we found.

In January 2020, we rated the practice as Requires Improvement for providing safe services because:

  • The provider could not demonstrate that all required recruitment checks had been completed prior to staff commencing their roles.
  • Staff immunisations were not being recorded by the practice.
  • There was no evidence of clinical supervision and oversight of the prescribing practice of non-medical prescribers.
  • Medicines were not being safely stored due to ineffective oversight of the cold chain.
  • Significant events were not being reviewed to look for themes and trends.

How we carried out the inspection:

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to avoid an on-site visit. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Undertaking a short site visit to undertake checks and review evidence.
  • Reviewing evidence sent in advance of the inspection to demonstrate action taken and improvements made.
  • Speaking with staff.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall.

We found that:

  • Improvements had been made to the management of staff recruitment files.
  • Records of staff immunity status and vaccination history had been compiled. Although some gaps remained, the practice had taken steps to reduce risk and had a schedule for completion.
  • Evidence reviewed demonstrated there was a system for ensuring clinical oversight of prescribing for non-medical prescribers, this included audits of treatments.
  • Systems for ensuring the effective supervision of the cold chain had been implemented to support safe management and storage of medicines.
  • Standard Operating Procedures relating to the destruction of controlled drugs were being implemented effectively.
  • Significant events were reviewed as standing agenda items at regular meetings with evidence of learning and dissemination where needed.

The provider should:

  • Continue to complete staff records relating to immunity status and vaccination history.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

22 January 2020

During a routine inspection

We decided to undertake an inspection of this service following our annual review of the information available to us. This inspection looked at the following key questions:

  • Safe
  • Effective
  • Caring
  • Responsive
  • Well-led

At the last inspection in October 2015 we rated the practice as good overall.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services because:

  • Recorded fridge temperatures, over a period of time, indicated that medicines had not been stored safely within the practice.
  • Gaps in recruitment checks had not been addressed by the provider prior to our inspection.
  • There was a lack of records in relation to staff immunisations.
  • Significant events were not being recorded and reviewed to identify themes and trends.

We rated the practice as good for providing effective, caring, responsive and well-led services because:

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure that care and treatment is provided in a safe way.

(Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report).

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

6 October 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Greens Norton Medical Centre on 6 October. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice