The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Stalham Staithe Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Staithe Surgery, Lower Staithe Road, Stalham, Norwich, Norfolk, NR12 9BU (01692) 582000

Provided and run by:
Stalham Staithe Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Stalham Staithe Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Stalham Staithe Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

12 January 2024

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out a targeted assessment of Stalham Staithe Surgery on 12 January 2024 without a site visit. Overall, the practice is rated as good. We rated the key question of responsive as good.

Safe -good

Effective – good

Caring - good

Responsive – good

Well led – good

Following our previous inspection in 2019, the practice was rated good overall and for all key questions. At this inspection, we rated the practice good for providing responsive services.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Stalham Staithe Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out this inspection as part of our GP-responsive assessment

  • Responsive question inspected

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • The practice had positive GP national patient survey data and was above expected national targets.
  • Patients were given options for booking appointments to make access to the practice more streamlined.
  • The provider had trained staff in recognising changes to health conditions to access the correct clinician without delays.
  • Longer appointment times were made available for more complex patients to avoid multiple appointments.
  • Learning disability patients had appointments offered at quieter times and this had increased compliance.
  • The provider would involve all staff with complaints to gain feedback and opportunities to learn.
  • The practice had reviewed access to their onsite dispensary and installed a dispensing machine. Patients would receive a code to collect their prescriptions at any point in 24 hours.

Although we did not identify any breaches, the provider:

  • Increase the number of learning disability checks completed.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

19 Mar to 19 Mar 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Stalham Staithe Surgery on 19 March 2019 as part of our inspection programme. The practice was previously inspected in June 2016 and rated as good overall.

Our judgement of the quality of care at this service is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected, information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall.

This means that:

  • People were protected from avoidable harm and abuse and that legal requirements were met.
  • Patients had good outcomes because they received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • The practice was fully engaged with reviewing and monitoring the clinical service they offered and used this information to make changes and drive care. For example, the practice regularly reviewed data from the Clinical Commissioning Group and used this to drive improvement within the practice as well as having a comprehensive audit programme.
  • Patients were supported, treated with dignity and respect and were involved as partners in their care.
  • Outcomes from the GP Patient Survey were consistently in line with, or above average.
  • People’s needs were met by the way in which services were organised and delivered. For example, the practice had engaged with the Volunteer Norfolk scheme which helped people get back into work.
  • The leadership, governance and culture of the practice promoted the delivery of high quality person-centred care.
  • The practice encouraged continuous improvement and innovation. For example, the practice had a diverse skill mix within the practice and encouraged staff to undertake further education.
  • Staff reported they were happy and proud to work in the practice.

We found the provider should:

  • Monitor the compliance of staff with dispensary standard operating procedures.
  • Review the safeguarding register to ensure it is updated appropriately.
  • Consider the need to document discussions about prescribing and consultation reviews with non-medical prescribers.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence table.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BS BM BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

19 April 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Staithe Surgery on 19 April 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • The appointment system was flexible and ensured that patients who requested to be seen on the same day were.
  • The practice had good facilities including disabled access. A hearing loop was available for those patients who needed it. Patients that were particularly unwell were asked to wait in areas where reception staff could observe them, in case their condition changed.
  • Information about the services and how to complain was available. The practice sought patient views about improvements that could be made to the service and some of these discussions occurred through the patient participation group (PPG).
  • The practice proactively managed care plans for vulnerable patients and had effective management strategies for patients at the end of their life.
  • There were systems, policies and procedures to keep patients safe and to govern activity for example, infection control.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance.
  • The practice produced a newsletter each quarter to ensure that patients were kept up to date with any changes at the practice.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

28 February 2014

During a routine inspection

Staff told us that patients were respected and involved. All the consulting rooms were located away from the waiting areas so that consultations were private and confidential. Health professionals discussed all treatment and care options with patients so that they understood what options were open to them. Information leaflets were given to patients so that they were well informed with up to date information. One patient told us, 'It's the best I've ever been to.' Another patient said, 'I would definitely recommend them. They explain things.' Another patient told us, 'It's a brilliant surgery.'

Computerised records were kept to a consistent standard and clear information about consultations was recorded. The new patient registration system ensured that patients with on-going health and medication needs were seen quickly and did not have their treatment regimes interrupted. People who were not able to attend during the day were able to arrange a consultation at the evening surgery that was held on a Wednesday. People told us that they did not have difficulty in getting an appointment that suited them.

A range of audits were taking place that assessed the quality of the service. These included prescribing and medication audits and specific treatment regimes. There were mechanisms in place to investigate incidents, with action being taken as necessary. People told us they knew how to complain and they felt they would be listened to.