The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Atherstone Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Surgery, 1 Ratcliffe Road, Atherstone, Warwickshire, CV9 1EU (01827) 713664

Provided and run by:
Atherstone Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Atherstone Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Atherstone Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

4 February 2020

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Atherstone Surgery on 4 February 2020. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

5 December 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

This practice is rated as Good overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Atherstone Surgery on 5 December 2017 as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • Urgent same day patient appointments were available when needed. All patients we spoke with and those who completed comment cards before our inspection said they were always able to obtain same day appointments and access care when needed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care delivered in line with current guidelines. Staff had the appropriate skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey revealed a high level of patient satisfaction about the care given at the practice. For example, 94% of patients who responded said the last GP they saw or spoke to was good at treating them with care and concern and 98% had confidence and trust in the last GP they saw or spoke to.

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.

  • Patients said GPs gave them enough time and treated them with dignity and respect.

  • A business development plan was in place for 2015-2020. Plans included the redevelopment of the practice building and extension of the car park to best meet patient demand and ease pressure on space.

  • The practice was located in an area withlarger elderly population and had identified over 1200 patients as carers (just under 8% of the practice list).

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

10 February 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We inspected this service on 10 February 2015 as part of our new comprehensive inspection programme.

The overall rating for this service is good. We found the practice to be rated as good in providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led services. We found the practice provided good care to older people, people with long term conditions, families, children and young people, the working age population and those recently retired, people in vulnerable circumstances and people experiencing poor mental health.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Patients were kept safe because there were arrangements in place for staff to report and learn from incidents that occurred. The practice had a system for reporting, recording and monitoring significant events over time.
  • There were systems in place to keep patients safe from the risk and spread of infection.
  • Evidence we reviewed demonstrated that patients were satisfied with how they were treated and that this was with compassion, dignity and respect. It also demonstrated that the GPs were good at listening to patients and gave them enough time.
  • The practice had an open culture that was effective and encouraged staff to share their views through staff meetings and significant event meetings.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice