• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Archived: Privategp.com Ltd (Private General Practice Services)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Beech House No. 3 Knighton Grange Road, Stoneygate, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 2LF (0116) 270 0373

Provided and run by:
PrivateGP.Com Limited

All Inspections

22 March 2023

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Good overall (The service was rated as requires improvement at our comprehensive inspection in June 2022).

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at PrivateGP.com Ltd on 22 March 2023.

The service had been inspected in October 2021 and was placed into special measures and issued with warning notices. We returned to the practice in December 2021 and found that the service was compliant with the warning notices. That inspection was not rated.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) undertook a further comprehensive inspection of the service in June 2022, and the service was rated as inadequate in the key question of safe and requires improvement for providing effective and well-led services. It was rated as good for caring and responsive services. The overall rating was requires improvement but the service remained in special measures due to the inadequate rating in the safe key question. Two warning notices and a requirement notice were issued. We returned to the service in October 2022 to review compliance with the two warning notices and we found that the service was compliant with these.

We placed conditions on the provider’s CQC registration following the inspection in October 2022 to ensure that standards of record keeping were improved. We asked the provider to make improvements regarding the breaches in regulations, and to comply with the conditions that were imposed. We checked adherence to record keeping standards as part of this comprehensive inspection in March 2023 and found that significant improvements had been made.

All previous inspection reports can be found on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some general exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Therefore, at PrivateGP.com Ltd, we were only able to inspect the services which fall under the scope of CQC registration and the regulated activities.

The lead GP, who is also the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Medical Director, is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • We found that there had been significant improvements to ensure compliance with our regulations since our previous inspections. The service had undergone major changes which had become embedded into everyday practice to ensure sustainable improvements in patient care.
  • The practice mostly ensured care and treatment was provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • We found that the service was caring and compassionate with patients and we observed a range of positive comments received from patients.
  • We found that the service was responsive and flexible to patients’ needs.
  • We found that the service had established effective governance and assurance processes.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to be mindful of safeguarding cases and report concerns to the local authority safeguarding team.
  • Ensure costs are transparent, for example, when prices increase due to consultations times being extended, or requiring a lengthier report.
  • The provider should complete a second cycle audit for antibiotic prescribing which had been planned for December 2022. They should also consider a future rolling audit programme for this.

I am taking this service out of special measures. This recognises the significant improvements that have been made to the quality of care provided by this service. In addition, the conditions that were previously placed on this provider’s registration with the CQC have now been removed.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

26 October 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused inspection at PrivateGP.com on 26 October 2022 to review compliance with two warning notices issued following our previous inspection on 22 June 2022.

In June 2022, the service was rated as requires improvement overall with a rating of inadequate for the safe key question, and requires improvement for providing effective and well-led services. It was rated as good for being caring and responsive. This inspection on 26 October 2022 was undertaken to review compliance with the two warning notices which had to be met by 31 August 2022, however this inspection was not rated. The ratings from June 2022 still apply and the service therefore remains in special measures. This will be reviewed via a further comprehensive inspection to take place early in 2023.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for PrivateGP.com Ltd on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

PrivateGP.com Ltd provides an alternative means for patients to receive medical consultation, examination, diagnosis and treatment by general practitioners and clinical specialists.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some general exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Therefore, at PrivateGP.com Ltd, we were only able to inspect the services which fall under the scope of CQC registration and the regulated activities.

The lead GP, who is also the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Medical Director, is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • The service was compliant with the warning notices which had been issued at our previous inspection in June 2022.
  • Processes for adult and child safeguarding had been greatly improved.
  • The procedure for recording, investigating and learning from significant events had been established. Staff understood how to report concerns and they told us how they felt the process had a positive impact on learning and continual improvement.
  • The management and oversight of safety alerts was effective.
  • The quality of record-keeping had improved and was supported by an ongoing audit programme.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Implement a process to identify siblings of those children where safeguarding concerns are identified and add these individuals to the service’s safeguarding register (if they are also service users).
  • Update patient records to include key information from incoming correspondence.
  • Ensure safety netting is more clearly documented in patient records.
  • Review the approach to clinical coding.

We have not rated this service at this inspection and the ratings remains unchanged until we have completed a further inspection incorporating all relevant key questions.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

22 June 2022

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Requires improvement overall. (The service was rated as inadequate at our previous inspection in October 2021)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Inadequate

Are services effective? – Requires improvement

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Requires improvement

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at PrivateGP.com Ltd on 22 June 2022. This was to review the improvements that had been made since the provider was placed in special measures following our inspection in October 2021.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspected the provider in October 2021, and the service was rated as inadequate in the key questions of safe, effective and well-led and therefore received an overall inadequate rating. Three warning notices and a requirement notice were issued. We returned to the provider in November and December 2021 to review compliance with the three warning notices and we found that the service was mostly compliant with these, however some workstreams were ongoing and we therefore issued two further requirement notices. In addition, we placed conditions on the provider’s CQC registration to ensure that standards of record keeping were improved. We asked the provider to make improvements regarding the breaches in regulations, and to comply with the conditions that were imposed. We checked these areas as part of this comprehensive inspection in June 2022 and found that whilst significant improvements had been made, there were still some issues which needed further attention to achieve regulatory compliance. Previous inspection report can be found on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some general exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Therefore, at PrivateGP.com Ltd, we were only able to inspect the services which fall under the scope of CQC registration and the regulated activities.

The lead GP, who is also the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Medical Director, is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • We found that there had been significant improvements to ensure compliance with our regulations since the previous inspection. However, some areas required further attention and work was ongoing to ensure that continued and sustainable improvements were achieved.
  • We found concerns relating to the provision of safe care and treatment. This included the lack of a robust approach to safeguarding vulnerable patients; the need to ensure patient records were fully accurate and that key information was readily available; letters in patient records received from other health care professionals that had been filed without follow up actions being completed; and the need to embed a process to ensure that all significant events were identified and used as a learning experience to improve the service.
  • We found concerns relating to the provision of effective services. This included the need to develop a more established programme of quality improvement and clinical audit to demonstrate the efficacy of patient outcomes.
  • We found that the service was caring and compassionate with patients and we observed a range of positive comments received from patients.
  • We found that the service was responsive and flexible to patients’ needs.
  • We found that the service did not have sufficient governance or assurance processes in place. This had improved since our previous inspection, but some issues required more attention, including a more comprehensive oversight of the work undertaken by contracted professionals, and strengthening of systems to support good governance such as learning from complaints and significant events.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

(Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report).

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Only supply unlicensed medicines against valid special clinical needs of an individual patient where there is no suitable licensed medicine available.
  • The infection control lead should undertake additional training to support their role.

This service was placed in special measures in November 2021. Insufficient improvements have been made such that there remains a rating of inadequate for providing safe services. Therefore we are taking action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration within six months if they do not improve. The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within six months, and if there is not enough improvement we will move to close the service by adopting our proposal to vary the provider’s registration to remove this location or cancel the provider’s registration.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

17 November 2021 and 1 December 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused inspection at PrivateGP.com on 17 November 2021 to review compliance with three warning notices issued following our previous inspection on 12 October 2021. In addition, we returned to the practice on 1 December 2021 to review patient records as part of the same inspection.

In October 2021, the service was rated as inadequate overall and also for the key questions of safe, effective and well-led. The practice was placed into special measures. This inspection on 17 November 2021 was undertaken to review compliance with the warning notices which had to be met by 16 November 2021, but this inspection was not rated. The ratings from October 2021 therefore still apply and will be reviewed via a further inspection to take place within the next six months. The service remains in special measures.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for PrivateGP.com Ltd on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection.

This inspection was a focused inspection to follow up on:

  • Compliance with warning notices issued in respect of breaches of regulation 12 (safe care and treatment); regulation 17 (good governance); and regulation 19 (fit and proper persons ).
  • Additional concerns relating to processes for safeguarding and the recording of consent which arose following our visit on 12 October.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have not rated this practice as the rating remains unchanged until we have completed a further inspection incorporating all relevant key questions.

Our key findings were:

  • We found concerns relating to the provision of safe care and treatment. This included aspects of medicines management; record keeping; and safeguarding patients.
  • We found concerns relating to the provision of effective services. This included the absence of an established programme of quality improvement and clinical audit to demonstrate the efficacy of patient outcomes; the processes for obtaining appropriate patient consent; and limited communication with the patient’s registered NHS GP or other appropriate stakeholders.
  • We found that the service did not have sufficient governance or assurance processes in place, supported by effective leadership.
  • We did not find that the service was compliant with our warning notices in respect of safe care and treatment and good governance (Regulations 12 and 17). We were satisfied that sufficient work had been completed to demonstrate compliance with the warning notices issued in respect of the warning notice relating to fit and proper persons (Regulation 19).

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care.

12 October 2021

During a routine inspection

This service is rated as Inadequate overall. At our previous inspection in March 2016, independent health services were not awarded a rating, but the service was found to be compliant in all of the key questions.

The key questions from our inspection in October 2021 are rated as:

Are services safe? – Inadequate

Are services effective? – Inadequate

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? – Inadequate

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at PrivateGP.com Ltd on 12 October 2021 as all independent health services now require a rated inspection. We also wanted to review the governance arrangements to support the prescribing of medical cannabis, as a new service which had been introduced by the provider in May 2021.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some general exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Therefore, at PrivateGP.com Ltd, we were only able to inspect the services which fall under the scope of CQC registration and the regulated activities.

The lead GP, who is also the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Medical Director, is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

Our key findings were:

  • We found concerns relating to the provision of safe care and treatment. This included some aspects of medicines management; systems to review and comply with good standards of infection control; a lack of robust recruitment procedures; and the oversight of health and safety supported by risk assessments to mitigate any areas of concern.
  • We found concerns relating to the provision of effective services. This included the absence of an established programme of quality improvement and clinical audit to demonstrate the efficacy of patient outcomes; the processes for obtaining appropriate patient consent; limited communication with the patient’s registered NHS GP; and ensuring that clinicians worked within the scope of their competencies.
  • We found that the service was caring and compassionate with patients and we observed a range of positive comments received from patients.
  • We found that the service was responsive and flexible to patients’ needs.
  • We found that the service did not have sufficient governance or assurance processes in place, supported by effective leadership.

The areas where the provider must make improvements as they are in breach of regulations are:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure ‘fit and proper’ persons are employed by operating robust recruitment procedures, including undertaking any relevant checks and having a procedure for ongoing monitoring of staff to make sure they are adequately trained and work within the scope of their role.
  • Ensure that care and treatment of service users is only be provided with the consent of the relevant person.

(Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report).

We issued the provider with three warning notices following our inspection, highlighting where improvements must be made.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Only supply unlicensed medicines against valid special clinical needs of an individual patient where there is no suitable licensed medicine available.
  • Improve access to the premises for service users who have a disability.
  • Undertake a review of the complaints procedure to provide assurance this is adhered to in line with guidance.

I am placing this service in special measures. Services placed in special measures will be inspected again within six months. If insufficient improvements have been made such that there remains a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration within six months if they do not improve.

The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within a further six months, and if there is not enough improvement we will move to close the service by adopting our proposal to remove this location or cancel the provider’s registration.

Special measures will give people who use the service the reassurance that the care they get should improve.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

31 March 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 31 March 2016 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Our key findings were:

  • There was an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Complaints were fully investigated and patients responded to with an apology and full explanation.
  • Risks to patients were always assessed and well managed.
  • The practice held a comprehensive central register of policies and procedures which were in place to govern activity.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider actively encouraged patient feedback and acted upon it.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

25 June 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

At our previous inspection of this service we identified concerns regarding the provider's lack of systems to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that patients received and we asked them to take action.

Prior to this inspection we reviewed information the provider had sent us. At the inspection we spoke with members of staff and looked at records.

We found that the provider had taken action and there were now systems in place to ensure the effective and safe management of the practice.

There was now a system in place to carry out regular audits, act on the findings and share learning with staff members by means of practice meetings.

Feedback from patient surveys had been reviewed and audited in order to identify any trends and changes to practice that may have been needed in order to improve the service.

The provider acted on risks which had been identified as part of their quality monitoring systems.

5 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three patients. They were all very satisfied with their treatment. Comments about the service included: 'I felt cosseted ' as though they cared and they'd got time to listen to my small concerns' and 'I can't speak highly enough about the place.' We found the provider was protecting people from unsafe treatment by assessing them individually. One of the patients we spoke with told us: 'I've never ever had such a wonderful explanation. The examination was very gentle.' People gave consent before any assessment or treatment was provided.

We found that medicines were managed safely. One patient we spoke with told us the GP routinely called them after prescribing a new medicine, to check they were taking it correctly and to check whether they were having any side effects.

The patients we spoke with were confident staff were qualified and competent in their roles. When we asked patients if they were confident in staff, one person replied: '100 per cent.' Another said: 'The staff were exceptional.'

Two of the three patients we spoke with had been asked for their views about the service. One commented: 'It would be very difficult for them to improve the service.' We found the provider was checking the quality of the service they provided and making improvements when they identified gaps. However, they did not have a system to ensure quality was regularly assessed and monitored.