• Doctor
  • GP practice

Cathedral Medical Group

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Cawley Road, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1XT (01243) 813450

Provided and run by:
Cathedral Medical Group

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Cathedral Medical Group on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Cathedral Medical Group, you can give feedback on this service.

13 February 2020

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Cathedral Medical Group on 13 February 2020. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

7 June 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

This announced focused inspection was carried out on 7June 2017 to confirm the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations we identified in our previous comprehensive inspection on15 March 2016. In March 2016 the overall rating for the practice was Good with Requires Improvement for the safe domain. The full comprehensive report for the March 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Cathedral Medical Group on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice is rated as Good

Our key findings were as follows:

The practice had clearly defined systems, processes and practices to minimise risks to patient safety.

Risks to patients were assessed and well managed in relation to the safe management of medicines and prescriptions.

A risk assessment was in place to ensure patient safety in respect of the employment of suitable staff. The appropriate staff had received a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check. (DBS checks identify whether a person has a criminal record or is on an official list of people barred from working in roles where they may have contact with children or adults who may be vulnerable).

The practice had made changes to the décor of the building to improve cleanliness and infection control.

Since the last inspection the practice had formed a patient participation group (PPG) that met regularly and worked alongside the virtual PPG to make improvements at the practice; for example, introducing ways of encouraging patients to use the self-help blood pressure monitoring machine located in the waiting area.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

15 March 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Cathedral Medical Group on 15 March 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed. However the practice did not have comprehensive arrangements in place for the safe management of medicines.
  • One member of staff and one volunteer had not had the necessary recruitment checks undertaken before employment.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure all staff have received either a disclosure and barring service check (DBS) or an associated risk assessment.

  • Put arrangements in place for the safe management of medicines.

The area where the provider should make improvements is:

  • The practice should continue to improve their appointments system and look at ways of improving the emergency appointments system to include seeking advice from outside of the practice.

  • Continue to look at ways of reducing the number of patients excepted from Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) calculations in line with local and national results.

  • Put an action plan in place to help improve the levels of patient satisfaction with the helpfulness of receptionists.

  • Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice