• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Quarter Jack Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Rodways Corner, Wimborne, Dorset, BH21 1AP (01202) 843626

Provided and run by:
The Quarter Jack Surgery

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 13 October to 21 October 2025.

The Quarter Jack Surgery is a GP practice and delivers service to approximately 15,500 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The service also has a branch site, known as The Old Dispensary.

This was a comprehensive assessment covering all key questions in safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led. We inspected this service because the age of the rating and also in response to information of concern.

The National General Practice Profiles states the service has a higher-than-average number of patients over the age of 60 and also between the ages of 10 and 19.

Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 9th decile (9 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others.

This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The service demonstrated a good learning culture, and people could raise concerns. Leaders investigated incidents thoroughly, ensuring people were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and effectively managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained, and any risks were mitigated. There were sufficient staff with the appropriate skills, qualifications, and experience to deliver safe, high-quality care. Leaders ensured staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain standards. Medicines were managed safely, and people were involved in planning any changes to their care.

The service was overdue a fire risk assessment, and their last completed one was in 2019 which was identified during the inspection. The service was able to provide evidence that this had been booked following the inspection. The service had previously completed an assessment with the local fire and rescue service which resulted in an action plan for immediate and follow-up actions, as well as fire warden risk assessments.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people and made decisions in people’s best interests when they did not have capacity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The service supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Leaders worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

6 December 2018

During a routine inspection

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous rating 08 2015 – Good)

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Quarter Jack Surgery on 6 December 2018, as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to embed the system for monitoring of significant events and complaints to demonstrate all actions taken are appropriately monitored.
  • Continue to make sure staff receive timely appraisals.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

18th August 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at on 18th August 2015.

Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The practice is using text messaging technology and investigating other technology such as Skype consultations for some patients.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider should:

  • Have clear action plans with timescales when making improvements in response to complaints.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice