During an assessment under our new approach
Date of Assessment: 7th September 2026. Upton Group Practice is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 7785 people under a contract held with NHS England. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the service area is approximately 95.4% White, 2.3% Asian, 1.4% Mixed, 0.4% Black and 0.6% Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows deprivation within the service population group is in the 7th decile (7 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the service population is relative to others.
This was a focused assessment. We undertook this assessment due to the length of time since our last inspection. We assessed 10 quality statements from across all 5 key questions. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.
Staff maintained clean facilities and ensured equipment was appropriately tested to keep people safe. They assessed and managed the risk of infection and took steps to reduce the risk of its spread. There were sufficient staff with the appropriate skills, qualifications and experience. However, processes to monitor and track compliance in relation to risk management, infection control and staff compliance and oversight were not always effective.
Staff supported people to live healthier lives, monitoring their care and treatment to ensure they received positive and consistent outcomes.
Staff treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion, and respected their privacy and dignity.
People could access care, treatment and support when they needed it. Leaders and staff were alert to discrimination and inequality that could disadvantage groups of people who used the service and sought ways to address any barriers.
The provider had a clear vision and strategy, which considered the needs of the people who used the service and the wider community. Staff understood their individual roles and responsibilities. Leaders were accountable for the actions, behaviours and performance of staff through established governance processes; however, these were not always fully effective in ensuring that all required actions were consistently completed and evidenced.