• Doctor
  • GP practice

Poundbury Doctors Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3 Frederick Treves House, St John Way, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 2FD (01305) 251128

Provided and run by:
Poundbury Doctors Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Poundbury Doctors Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Poundbury Doctors Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

04 May 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced inspection at Poundbury Doctors Surgery on 4 May 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Good

The key questions have been rated as;

Safe - Good

Effective - Good

Well-led - Good

Following our previous inspection on 14 February 2017 the practice was rated Good overall and for all key questions.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Poundbury Doctors Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection.

The CQC is currently undertaking a ‘Band 1 Quality Sampling review’ of practices rated Good/Outstanding. In each sector we are undertaking a percentage of inspections of band one services with published statements and are a key part of our quality assurance of the new monitoring approach.

How we carried out the inspection.

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A short site visit

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • We found appropriate recruitment checks were in place for staff working at the practice.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • Our review of clinical records found patients with long-term conditions received appropriate management and follow-up.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • The provider should ensure persons employed in the provision of the regulated activity receive the appropriate training, necessary to enable them to carry out their duties.
  • Monitor the systems put in place to improve uptake of cervical screening to ensure they are effective.
  • The provider should consider reviewing their processes and systems for recording and acting on safety alerts.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

11 January 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Poundbury Doctor's Surgery on 11 January 2017. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
  • The practice team was forward thinking and part of local pilot schemes to improve outcomes for patients in the area.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice