• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Mencap Flat 4 Aston Lodge Domiciliary Care Agency

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Flat 4 Office, Aston Lodge, Allerton Road, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, WD6 4BF (020) 8207 3854

Provided and run by:
Royal Mencap Society

All Inspections

20 September 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on the 20 and 23 September 2016 and was unannounced. This inspection was brought forward in response to concerning information received at the Care Quality Commission. The concerns suggested that people were not receiving appropriate care. There were concerns about how medicines were being managed and about people dignity. We last inspected the service on the 12 January 2016 and found that they were meeting the required standards at that time. At this inspection we found the service was continuing to meet these standards.

Mencap Flat 4 Aston Lodge Domiciliary Care Agency provides personal care to people in their own homes. In addition to the care provided at 4 Aston Lodge, care is also provided at two other local addresses Grove house and Winstre road. This inspection focused on concerns relating to 4 Aston Lodge. At the time of our inspection 9 people were receiving care at Grove and 3 people at Winstre road.

The home did not have a registered manager in post due to the departure of the registered manager four weeks before our inspection. However a new manager was in the process of registering with CQC. The outgoing registered manager had not yet deregistered with CQC. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There were sufficient numbers of suitable staff available at all times to meet people’s individual care and support needs. Safe and effective recruitment practices were followed to help ensure staff employed were suited to work in a care environment. Staff received training in how to protect people from abuse. Information from accidents and incidents was recorded and helped staff to reduce identified risks and help keep people safe. People received medicines by staff who had been trained and had their competency checked. There had been a number of medicines errors which had been identified and appropriate remedial action was taken to reduce the risk of a reoccurrence.

People were positive about the skills, experience and abilities of staff who worked at the home. Staff received induction and on-going training and refresher updates relevant to their roles as well as some specialist training relevant to the people they supported. Staff were well supported both through team meetings and one to one meetings with their line managers. People had regular access to a range health and social care professionals when necessary and were supported to eat a healthy balanced diet that met their individual requirements and choices.

We saw that staff obtained people’s consent and agreement before supporting them. We saw that staff were kind and caring in the way they treated people and were mindful of people’s dignity as well as preserving their privacy. We saw that staff had developed positive and caring relationships with the people they cared for. People could access advocacy services where appropriate which provided people with independent advice. People and their relatives were involved in the development and review of care when possible. People's information was securely maintained throughout the home.

People received personalised care and support that was responsive to their individual needs and took account of their preferences. Staff knew the people they looked after well and were knowledgeable about their background histories, preferences, routines and personal circumstances. People were supported to be involved and engaged with a range of activities and to pursue hobbies that were of interest to them.

Complaints, compliments and concerns were recorded and investigated thoroughly by the manager and these were used to support improvements and drive continual improvements.

People and staff were positive and complimentary about the management of the service and about how the home was run. There were systems and processes in place to monitor the quality of services provided. Where risks were identified appropriate actions were put in place to reduce and manage these effectively. Staff felt valued and enjoyed working at Grove House.

12 January 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection was carried out on 12 January 2016 and was announced. We gave the provider 48 hours’ notice of our intended inspection to ensure the right people would be present to assist us with our inspection.

Mencap Flat 4 Aston Lodge Domiciliary Care Agency provides support and care to people with a learning disability and who live in their own flats. The service was supporting 14 people at the time of our inspection.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the last inspection on 27/1/2014, the service was found to be meeting the standards in relation to all the outcomes we reviewed. At this inspection we found the service continued to meet the required standards.

People were protected from the risk of potential abuse, because staff had received training and had a good understanding of how to recognise and report concerns. Risks were assessed and reviewed, and actions were put in place to mitigate risks.

Staff were recruited through a robust recruitment process and received the appropriate training and supervision. We saw that staffing levels were appropriate to meet people’s assessed needs. People and staff told us they had adequate time to support people with all aspects of their daily living skills including supporting people to attend social activities.

People were supported to eat a healthy and varied diet. People had regular access to health care professionals. Care was personalised and people were involved in planning and reviewing their care and support.

The management team shared core values and supported people with a consistent approach to person centred care and support. There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service and these were kept under constant review to ensure continuous improvements.

27 January 2014

During a routine inspection

People said that that they were treated with respect. They also told us that they were encouraged to maintain and improve their skills in becoming more independent in their lives.

All of the people who we spoke with said that they received the right support and care to be able to continue to live in a community setting. They also said that they had enough things to do each day, which they said had helped them feel part of the community and valued. They, and their support and care plans confirmed that they were supported to maintain and promote their physical and mental health.

There were effective systems in place to safeguard people who used the service from abuse. People told us that they felt, 'Safe.'

Staff were trained and supported to safely do their job, which they said that they enjoyed. People who used the service said that they got on well with staff members.

Quality assurance systems were in place to ensure that people were protected from inadequate and unsafe support and care. People were also provided with opportunities to make suggestions and comments to improve the quality of the service.