• Doctor
  • GP practice

Brook Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

183 Kedleston Road, Derby, Derbyshire, DE22 1FT (01332) 291991

Provided and run by:
Brook Medical Centre

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Brook Medical Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Brook Medical Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

21 August 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Brook Medical Centre on 21 August 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

27 September 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Brook Medical Centre on 27 September 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety within the practice. Effective systems were in place to enable staff to report and record significant events. Learning from events was shared with relevant staff.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed. A range of risk assessments were in place within the practice to support the ongoing review and management of risk.
  • In response to a recent child death enquiry in the Midlands, the practice made the decision to automatically register all babies on receipt of the birth notice rather than waiting for the parents to register them. The practice told us they hoped that this would prevent children being missed and not known to health and care services.

  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Feedback from patients about their care, and their interactions with all practice staff, was positive. Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Most patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a GP. Urgent appointments were available on the day for patients who needed them. Advanced bookings could be made with no restriction on timescales.
  • The practice used clinical audits to review patient care and outcomes had been used to improve services as a result.

  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • The practice worked effectively with the wider multi-disciplinary team to plan and deliver effective and responsive care to keep vulnerable patients safe.
  • There was a clear leadership structure within the practice, and staff felt well-supported by management.
  • The practice reviewed the way it delivered services as a consequence of feedback from patients and from staff. For example the practice had recruited a healthcare assistant to support the nursing team following feedback.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice