• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Dr Thomas Guilder Also known as Riverbank Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Westcott Street, Westcott, Dorking, Surrey, RH4 3PA (01306) 875577

Provided and run by:
Dr Thomas Guilder

All Inspections

17 August 2015

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of this practice on 9 June 2015. Breaches of legal requirements were found during that inspection within the safe domain. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice sent to us an action plan detailing what they would do to meet the legal requirements in relation to the following:

  • Ensure equipment and medicines that may be required in an emergency are reviewed and made readily available where deemed appropriate.
  • Ensure all staff working under Patient Group Directions (PGDs) are authorised to administer in line with national requirements (PGDs are written instructions for the supply or administration of medicines to groups of patients who may not be individually identified before presentation for treatment).
  • Carry out regular fire drills

We undertook this focused inspection on 17 August 2015 to check that the provider had followed their action plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Our key findings across the areas we inspected were as follows:-

  • Emergency equipment and medicines were readily available.
  • Nurses Patient Group Directions (PGDs) were authorised to administer vaccinations in line with national requirements.
  • The practice had carried out a fire drill evacuation and had plans in place to do this on a regular basis.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

9 June 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

The practice has an overall rating of good.

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Thomas Guilder (also known as Riverbank Surgery) on 9 June 2015. Riverbank Surgery provides personal medical services to people living in Westcott and the Dorking area. At the time of our inspection there were approximately 2,000 patients registered at the practice with a team of a principal GP, a part time locum female GP, a practice nurse, a small team of receptionists / administration staff, a medical secretary and a dispensary manager. At the time of the inspection the practice manager’s position was vacant.

The inspection team spoke with staff and patients and reviewed policies and procedures. The practice understood the needs of the local population and engaged effectively with other services. Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing well-led, effective, caring and responsive services. It requires improvement for safe. We found the practice was delivering a good service to all its different population groups.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses.
  • Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance.
  • Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients told us they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Patients spoke positively about how they were treated by staff. This was consistent with feedback from comment cards and patient surveys.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with the GP and that urgent appointments were available the same day.
  • The practice was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management.
  • The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • There were effective systems in place for the controlling the risk of infection. The practice was clean and hygienic.
  • We found that some medicines and equipment for dealing with emergencies were not readily available
  • There were effective system for ensuring that changes to patients medication following an outpatient appointment, A&E attendance or recent hospital stay were actioned in a timely manner
  • There was close working with other dispensers from local practices to share training and best practice.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly, the provider must:

  • Ensure equipment and medicines that may be required in an emergency are reviewed and made readily available where deemed appropriate.
  • Ensure all staff working under Patient Group Directions (PGDs) are authorised to administer in line with national requirements (PGDs are written instructions for the supply or administration of medicines to groups of patients who may not be individually identified before presentation for treatment).
  • Carry out regular fire drills

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

28 November 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook this inspection visit to review infection control procedures in the practice. This was following non-compliance, which had been identified at the last inspection on 25 June 2013. We reviewed records and systems and looked at the environment and how this impacted on the service delivery. We spoke with the GP, the practice nurse and the dispensary manager.

We found that the improvements needed to achieve compliance had been made. People who used the service were protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance had been followed.

25 June 2013

During a routine inspection

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of patients who used the service. We talked with five patients, and observed interaction between staff and patients. We reviewed records and systems. We looked at the environment and how this impacted on the service delivery. We spoke with staff that included; the practice manager/medicines dispenser, the dispensary manager, the practice nurse, a visiting pharmacist, a receptionist and the principle GP.

This told us the appointment system in the practice had worked well for patients. Patient's care needs had been assessed; they had time to discuss their health care issues, and had been fully involved in making decisions about their care and treatment.

Policies and procedures were in place to protect vulnerable adults and children. Staff in the practice had received training to ensure they had an understanding of what constituted abuse.

Patients told us the practice was always clean. They could remember that they had seen clinical staff had washed their hands before examining them or carrying out a procedure. However, we reviewed the facilities and practice in relation to infection control. We found that risks associated with cross infection had not been fully assessed.

Recruitment policies and procedures had been put in place to protect patients.

The practice had procedures in place to respond to complaints and review the quality of the service provided.