• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Ryan Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

St Marys Road, Bamber Bridge, Preston, Lancashire, PR5 6JD (01772) 335136

Provided and run by:
The Ryan Medical Centre

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Ryan Medical Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Ryan Medical Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

12 March 2020

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about The Ryan Medical Centre on 12 March 2020. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

9 November 2018

During a routine inspection

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous rating 18 August 2015 – Good)

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Ryan Medical Centre on 9 November 2018. This inspection was carried out under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. The inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
  • There was a clear management structure in place and staff had lead roles in all areas of practice service provision.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • Feedback from patients was consistently positive about the quality of care and treatment offered by the practice.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation. The practice participated in the training of new GPs and was a teaching practice for medical students.

We saw two areas of outstanding practice:

  • One of the GPs had worked to develop a local social prescribing directory. This included churches and community centres, activities and sports, women’s services, libraries, friendship and social groups, baby and toddler groups, support for minority groups, young people’s services and an index of relevant resources available. Staff and GPs used it to signpost patients to relevant services and planned to make it freely available to patients.
  • The practice introduced new systems, such as the management of post and a ‘care navigation’ system after careful, considered planning and comprehensive staff training. These systems were reviewed and audited by GPs on an ongoing basis to ensure they worked safely and effectively as intended.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Review the practice register of patients who are carers to ensure it is correct.
  • Continue to monitor loose prescriptions in the practice.
  • Improve the review of actions taken as a result of serious incidents and allow for actions taken as a result of safety alerts to be centrally recorded.
  • Develop a management overview of clinical staff training.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

18 August 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Ryan Medical Centre on 18 August 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients were complimentary about the overall quality of service they received but some said that they found it difficult sometimes getting through to the practice by telephone, especially in the early morning. Urgent appointments were available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • There was good awareness of where the practice needed to improve the services it provided and action plans were implemented successfully to address these areas.

We saw areas of outstanding practice including:

  • The practice used innovative and proactive methods to improve outcomes for patients who lived in residential and nursing care homes. They worked collaboratively with two other local GP practices and between them employed an advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) to provide a dedicated service to these patients. This included weekly on site ‘clinics’, where patients’ health care needs were reviewed and early intervention treatment provided as required. Care home staff benefited from this regular guidance and support and the impact was a reduction in GP call outs to the care homes and unnecessary admissions to hospital.
  • The practice provided a ‘Sit and Wait’ service. Patients could just drop in to see the practice nurse for blood tests, blood pressure monitoring, dressings, contraception checks and regular injections such as vitamin B12.
  • The practice offered pre-bookable GP appointments every Sunday morning.

There were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements

  • The practice should ensure its recruitment policy reflects the current regulatory requirements, and includes the recruitment of locum GPs.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice