• Doctor
  • GP practice

Dr Rozewicz & Partners Also known as Simpson House Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

255-255a Eastcote Lane, Harrow, Middlesex, HA2 8RS (020) 8864 3466

Provided and run by:
Dr Rozewicz & Partners

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Dr Rozewicz & Partners on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Dr Rozewicz & Partners, you can give feedback on this service.

28 September 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Dr Rozewicz & Partners on 28 September 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

21 July 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Rozewicz and Partners (also known as Simpson House Medical Centre) on 21 July 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • The governance framework supported the delivery of the strategy and good quality care, although arrangements to monitor and improve quality of services needed to be strengthened in areas.

  • Although there were translation services provided, there were no notices displayed in the practice informing patients this service was available. This was quickly addressed.

  • The arrangements for managing medicines, including emergency medicines and vaccines, in the practice kept patients safe. Prescription pads had not been stored securely but this was quickly addressed.

  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect, but some said they were not always able to get appointments when they needed them.

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

  • There were effective systems in place to safeguard vulnerable adults and children. Two of the management staff had received level 4 child safeguarding training.

  • The practice had a system in place to identify carers. There was effective joint working with the patient participation group (PPG) and an external organisation to undertake carers' events such as hosting a monthly coffee morning.

  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.

  • The practice’s Simpson Spectator quarterly newsletter, developed by the PPG together with the practice, was available in easy read format.

  • There was a staff recognition programme in place which allowed practice staff and patients to nominate and recognise an individual staff member for their achievements.

  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

In addition, the provider should:

  • Monitor the new prescriptions security policy to ensure all staff are aware of it, and that it is being adhered to.

  • Monitor and improve patient satisfaction regarding access to appointments and contacting the practice by telephone.

  • Monitor and improve performance, specifically patient outcomes in relation to the Quality and Outcomes Framework and cervical screening.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice