You are here

Archived: Dr Anil Kumar Kaistha Good

The provider of this service changed - see new profile

Reports


Inspection carried out on 25 August 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Anil Kumar Kaistha on 25 August 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
  • Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patient survey figures were consistently above average when compared with CCG and national averages.
  • Comments about the practice and staff were wholly positive and included patients thanking the staff and GPs for the service provided.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day. We saw this to be the case on the day of inspection.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.
  • Safety alerts and alerts from Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) were reviewed and cascaded to the appropriate persons. However, we saw no evidence the practice carried out reviews and completed searches on the patient record system to ensure action was taken against the alerts. A new process and documentation had been devised to rectify this.
  • The practice offered extended hours Wednesday until 7.45pm for working patients who could not attend during normal opening hours.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Ensure actions from the annual infection control audits are addressed.

  • Embed new process for the management of safety alerts.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice