Archived: Brook Green Surgery

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of Brook Green Surgery on the 3 December 2015. The practice was rated as requires improvement for providing safe care. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice submitted an action plan, outlining what they would do to ensure the care they provided was effective and met the standard required by CQC.

We undertook this focussed inspection on 25 July 2016 to check that the practice had followed their plan and to confirm that they were now providing safe care. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also where additional improvements have been made following the initial inspection. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Brook Green Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Overall the practice was rated as Good.

Following the focussed inspection we found the practice to be good for providing safe care.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

• All staff had been Disclosure and Barring Service checked. (DBS checks identify whether a person has a criminal record or is on an official list of people barred from working in roles where they may have contact with children or adults who may be vulnerable).

• All patient records were kept in safe and secured locked cabinets.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Brook Green Surgery on 3 December 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Please note that when referring to information throughout this report, for example any reference to the Quality and Outcomes Framework data, this relates to the most recent information available to the CQC at that time.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

• There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events. For example, all staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents.
• Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
• Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
• Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
• Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
• Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
• The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
• There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
• The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

The areas where the provider must make improvement are:

• The practice must have DBS checks for the nursing team and non-clinical staff that carried out chaperone duties.

• The practice must keep patient records in a safe and secure location away from public access.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

• The practice should review its provisions of services to female patients.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice