• Doctor
  • GP practice

Sandy Lane Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

77 Sandy Lane, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, NG18 2LT (01623) 656055

Provided and run by:
Sandy Lane Surgery

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 27 October to 5 December 2025. Sandy Lane Surgery delivers services to 9,707 people under a contract held with NHS England. The ethnic make-up of the practice area was 94.42% white, 1.54% mixed, 2.01% Asian, 1.23% Black and other 0.81%. The age distribution of the practice population shows they have a lower proportion of older people and higher proportion of working age and young people, in comparison to local and national averages. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group were in the 2nd decile (2 of 10). The higher the decile, the least deprived the practice population were relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within, and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

People were protected and kept safe. The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes. People were involved in assessments of their needs, and care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. People were treated with kindness and compassion. People were involved in decisions about their care including understanding options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care. The service provided information people could understand. Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. The service supported staff wellbeing. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

23/03/2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Sandy Lane Surgery on 23 March 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led services. It was also good for providing services for older people, people with long-term conditions, families, children and young people, working age people (including those recently retired and students), people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable and people experiencing poor mental health (including those with dementia).

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients told us that the continuity of GPs was a good feature of the practice, although some told us that appointment times could overrun.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed, with the exception of those relating to the practice building.

There were some areas of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • Consider formalising working arrangements with relevant professionals to discuss issues related to safeguarding children and young people.
  • Review the availability of suitably trained and vetted staff to provide chaperone duties to ensure a chaperone is available at all times.
  • Improve record keeping of risk assessments and the actions taken in response to identified risks, to promote good governance.
  • Review the emergency medicines for the treatment of seizures to ensure that they are age appropriate.
  • Consider increased promotion of measures available to improve the health and wellbeing of patients. For example, the provision of flu vaccines in the ‘at risk’ groups and nationally available cancer screening programmes.

Investigate and implement measures to improve the time keeping of appointments.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice