• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Inner City Care, Lancaster House

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

10 Sherwood Rise, Nottingham, NG7 6JE (0115) 856 1140

Provided and run by:
Miss Robina Parween

All Inspections

13 July 2023

During a routine inspection

About the service

Inner City Care – Lancaster House is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to 17 people at the time of the inspection. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People’s care records and risk assessments were not comprehensive, did not always reflect people’s care needs and were not always person-centred.

Quality assurance processes were ineffective and did not highlight the concerns we have raised throughout this report. A manager had been in place for two months at the time of the inspection. There had been 3 managers in 12 months which has contributed to the inconsistent care planning, risk assessment and quality assurance of the service as a whole.

Medicine records were inconsistently completed. People felt safe when staff cared for them in their homes; however, safeguarding and accident and incident reporting and investigation processes were inconsistent. Guidance and assessments provided by other health and social care professionals had not always been used to form meaningful care plans, placing people at risk of inconsistent or inappropriate care.

Most people were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. However, the policies and systems in the service did not always support this practice. We found the paperwork used to record and assess people’s ability to make decisions for themselves did not always follow the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We have made a recommendation about this in the effective part of this report.

Staff had completed mandatory training; however, other training, which the provider told us should have been completed by staff, had not yet been completed by all. The provider did not have the processes in place to monitor and address this with staff.

People’s communication needs were not always taken into account to reduce the risk of discrimination. People’s protected characteristics were not thoroughly considered when care was planned. People’s hobbies and interests, likes and dislikes were not always recorded in their care records.

People felt their medicines were well-managed; however, improvements were needed to ensure records relating to the management and administration of medicines were consistently completed.

People found staff to be kind and caring. Staff followed infection prevention and control practices to keep people safe.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 9 January 2020). The service remains rated requires improvement. This service has been rated requires improvement for two consecutive inspections.

Why we inspected

The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about staff recruitment and suitability to work. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks.

We found evidence that the provider needed to make improvements. Please see the safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led sections of this full report.

You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.

Enforcement and Recommendations

We have identified 2 breaches in relation to safety and governance at this inspection. We have made one recommendation in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found during inspections is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

7 November 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Inner City Care is a domiciliary care service that provides care and support to 5 people living in their own homes.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The service was not always well-led. Although they took immediate and appropriate action following our discussions, the registered provider had not always ensured that safe recruitment, governance and quality assurance procedures had been fully established in this relatively new service. We found no evidence during our inspection that people had been harmed by these actions.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People knew how to complain and knew the process to follow if they had concerns.

People told us they felt safe when receiving care and support. Staff were aware of measures to take to prevent and control the spread of infection. There was a procedure to record and monitor any accidents/incidents which may occur, none had occurred in the last twelve months.

Staff were deployed in dedicated teams to visit people in their homes. This meant that people were supported by consistent staff who knew them well, allowing relationships to develop. People gave positive feedback about the caring staff team.

People were treated with kindness, respect and without discrimination. Staff supported people to maintain their independence and people were involved in decisions about their care.

Staff, people using the service and relatives spoke positively about the support they received from the registered manager.

Why we inspected

This service was registered with us on 08/08/2018 and this is the first comprehensive inspection.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements, please see the safe, effective and well-led sections of this full report. The provider has taken immediate actions to mitigate the risk to people by ensuring that pre-employment checks were made.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at ww.cqc.org.uk