• Doctor
  • GP practice

McKenzie House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

17 Kendal Road, Hartlepool, Cleveland, TS25 1QU (01429) 230000

Provided and run by:
McKenzie Group Practice

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about McKenzie House on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about McKenzie House, you can give feedback on this service.

10 December 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced inspection at McKenzie House on 10 December 2021. This inspection was focused on the management of access to appointments.

Overall, the practice remains rated as Good. We did not rate this inspection.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for McKenzie House on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was undertaken in response to data we reviewed which suggested potential issues with access to appointments.

How we carried out the inspection

The inspection was led by a CQC lead inspector who spoke with staff on site. The inspection included a site visit.

Interviews were carried out with the practice manager and one of the GP partners.

We found that:

  • People were able to access appointments in a timely way.
  • The practice offered a range of appointment types.
  • There were systems in place to support people who face communication barriers to access treatment.
  • There were systems in place to monitor access to appointments and make improvements.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

24 and 25 January 2018

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection 13 May 2015 – Good)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at McKenzie House Practice on 24 January 2018. The reason for the inspection was as part of our inspection programme. We also visited the two branch sites on 25 January 2018. Additional supporting information was received following the inspection.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.

  • The practice was open and transparent, and had systems in place to adhere to the Duty of Candour.

  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.

  • Quality improvement was embedded into the practice.There was a comprehensive programme of clinical audit which was used to measure improvements to patient care.

  • The practice displayed a strong commitment to multidisciplinary working and could evidence how this positively impacted on individual patient care.

  • Discussion with staff and feedback from patients showed that staff were highly motivated to deliver care that was respectful, kind and caring.

  • The practice organised and delivered their services to meet the needs of their patient population.They were proactive in understanding the needs of the different patient groups.

  • The practice demonstrated a clear commitment to developing increased skill mix within all staff teams and there was clear evidence of the upskilling of staff.

  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

We saw areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice had developed effective multi-disciplinary working arrangements for identifying and supporting more complex patients. We saw evidence from minutes of meetings involving among others; Social Services, Cleveland Constabulary, Hartlepool and North Tees NHS Trust. We saw agreed plans were in place for the management of a number of patients with complex needs, which set out agreed parameters and ensured consistency in approach.

  • The practice demonstrated a strong commitment to on-going development and innovative practice for the benefits of their practice population.

  • The leadership in the practice drove continuous improvement and staff were accountable for delivering change. There was a clear proactive approach to seeking out and embedding new ways of providing care and treatment.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

13/05/2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an inspection of McKenzie House practice on 13 May 2015 as part of our comprehensive programme of inspection of primary medical services. The inspection team found after analysing all of the evidence that the practice was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led. In summary our key findings were as follows:

  • The practice provided good, safe, responsive and effective care for all population groups in the area it serves.
  • Where incidents had been identified relating to safety, staff had been made aware of the outcome and action taken where appropriate, to keep patients and staff safe.
  • Patients received care according to professional best practice clinical guidelines. The practice had regular information updates, which informed staff about new guidance to ensure they were up to date with best practice.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • The service was responsive and ensured patients received accessible, individual care, whilst respecting their needs and wishes. They had worked hard to recruit staff to improve accessibility and continuity of care to the practice population.
  • The service was well led and there were positive working relationships between staff and other healthcare professionals involved in the delivery of service.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

In addition the provider should take to improve:

  • Infection control in some areas of the branch surgery required attention.
  • The process for stock rotation in the branch surgery.
  • The process for Chaperone training and Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks.
  • The storage of oxygen cylinders.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

26 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five patients who told us that they were treated well and felt that they were sufficiently involved in decisions about their treatment. One patient told us, 'The staff are always polite and friendly.' Another patient said, 'I have seen the GPs and nurses here and they clearly talk through what happens next and what options are available.' We found that people who used the service were involved in their care and treatment and were treated with dignity and respect.

All the patients spoken with were happy with the treatment they received. One patient said, 'I try not to come in very often but when I do they always sort me and the kids out.' Another patient said, 'I always feel safe here and yes so far I have been pleased with the treatment I have received.' We found that treatment was delivered in a way which ensured that patients were safe and their needs were met.

We found that staff training was up to date and staff received regular appraisals. Staff told us they were working in a very supportive environment.

We found there were effective systems to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.