• Doctor
  • GP practice

Parkwood Family Practice

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

119-121 Long Catlis Road, Parkwood, Rainham, Gillingham, Kent, ME8 9RR (01634) 269610

Provided and run by:
Parkwood Family Practice

All Inspections

19 May 2023

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive follow up inspection at Parkwood Family Practice on 19 May 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as Requires Improvement.

The ratings for each key question are as follows:

Safe – Requires Improvement

Effective – Requires Improvement

Well-led – Good

We carried out an announced inspection at Parkwood Family Practice on 10 November 2022. Overall, the practice was rated as Requires Improvement. We rated the practice as Inadequate for providing safe services, Requires Improvement for providing effective and well- led services and Good for providing responsive services. We issued both a Warning Notice and a Requirement Notice as part of our enforcement action.

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection to re-rate the practice and ensure ongoing compliance with the regulations.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Parkwood Family Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • conducting staff interviews using video conferencing,
  • completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider,
  • patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider,
  • requesting evidence from the provider,
  • a short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement overall

We rated the practice as Requires Improvement for providing safe and effective services because:

  • An effective and standardised approach was applied to the safe care and treatment of patients prescribed high-risk medicines and those with long-term conditions. However, these required time to be fully embedded effectively and ensure that all patients received appropriate monitoring within the recommended timescales.
  • Recruitment checks and storage of staff files were now carried out in accordance with regulations and practice policy.
  • Staff vaccination was now being maintained in line with current UK Health and Security Agency guidance.
  • Risks to patients, staff and visitors were being routinely assessed, monitored and managed effectively.
  • Systems and processes for managing and responding to significant events had been improved and embedded effectively.
  • Staff induction training was being formally recorded and the provider was able to demonstrate that all clinical staff had received training in recognising and managing sepsis.
  • Leaders were aware of all required improvements to ensure the quality, safety and performance of the service. However, further improvements were required.
  • Improvements had been made to the processes and systems that supported good governance and management.
  • The practice’s processes for managing risks, issues and performance had been improved and were now effective.

We rated the practice as Good for providing well-led service because:

  • There was compassionate leadership at all levels and leaders were aware of required improvements to ensure the quality, safety and performance of the service.
  • Improvements had been made to ensure the processes and systems that supported good governance and management were embedded effectively.
  • The practice’s processes for managing risks, issues and performance were now effective.

We found breaches of regulations. The provider must:

Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

10 November 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced inspection at Parkwood Family Practice on 10 November 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Requires Improvement.

Safe – Inadequate

Effective – Requires Improvement

Responsive - Good

Well-led - Requires Improvement

Why we carried out this inspection

This was an announced comprehensive inspection to provide the practice with an up to date rating. At our previous inspection on 18 May 2016, the practice was rated Good overall.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Parkwood Family Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing,
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider,
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider,
  • A short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement overall

We rated the practice as Inadequate for providing safe services because:

  • Recruitment checks were not always carried out in accordance with regulations and practice policy.
  • Staff vaccination was not always maintained in line with current Public Health England guidance.
  • Risks to patients, staff and visitors were not always assessed, monitored or managed effectively.
  • Systems and processes for managing and responding to significant events were not effective.

We rated the practice as Requires Improvement for providing effective and well-led services because:

  • Patients’ needs were assessed, but care and treatment was not always delivered in line with current legislation, standards and evidence-based guidance.
  • Patients with long-term conditions were not always receiving relevant reviews that included all elements necessary in line with current best practice guidance.
  • Staff induction training was not being formally recorded and the provider was unable to demonstrate that all clinical staff had received training in recognising and managing sepsis.
  • Leaders were not aware of all required improvements to ensure the quality, safety and performance of the service.
  • Improvements were required to the processes and systems that supported good governance and management.
  • The practice’s processes for managing risks, issues and performance were not always effective.

We found breaches of regulations. The provider must:

  • Establish effective systems to ensure safe care and treatment in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.
  • Ensure that staff are recruited, and records maintained in line with regulatory requirements.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

The provider should:

  • Have appropriate supplies of Automated External Defibrillator pads.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

18 May 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Parkwood Family Practice on 18 May 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are;

  • Revise governance processes to help ensure that all policy and procedure documents used to govern activity are up to date.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice