• Doctor
  • GP practice

Bramham Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Clifford Road, Bramham, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 6RN (01937) 845854

Provided and run by:
Bramham Medical Centre

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 20 November 2025 to 9 December 2025. Bramham Medical Centre is a GP practice which operates from Clifford Road, Bramham, Wetherby, LS23 6RN. It works closely with another nearby GP practice, Wetherby Health Centre which is operated by the same registered provider. Patients from the 2 practices are able to access services at both GP locations, and staff from the provider work across both sites. These practice locations share a joint Organisational Data Service code (ODS code - a unique organisational code created by the Organisation Data Service within NHS Digital and used to identify organisations across health and social care). As a result of this the performance data in this assessment such as prescribing data, child immunisation data, cancer screening data, and data relating to the GP Patient Survey is composed of information relating to both registered locations. The 2 registered locations deliver services to around 7,200 patients under a single contract held with the NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board. Bramham Medical Centre also offers a dispensary service in addition to the delivery of care and treatment services.

The National General Practice Profiles shows that both the practices operated by the provider serve a population whose ethnicity is predominantly White (96.8%), with other ethnicities being Asian (1%), Black (0.6%), Mixed (1.3%) and Other (0.3%). Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within both practice’s population groups is in the 9th decile (9 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of this patient population, the context the service was working within, and how this impacted service delivery.

The provider works closely with other partners and stakeholders such as their local primary care network (PCN) to deliver extended and enhanced services. The service is led by 2 GP Partners and 1 Managing Partner, and is delivered across their 2 registered locations by 7 salaried GPs, 1 advanced nurse practitioner, 2 practice nurses, 3 healthcare assistants, and 1 phlebotomist. The Bramham Medical Centre dispensary is staffed by 1 dispensary lead, and 2 dispensers. Clinical staff were supported by a practice manager, a deputy manager, and reception and administration teams. Support staff from the PCN included pharmacy technicians, and home visiting and specialist paramedics.

The practice was last inspected in 2018 when it was rated as good overall, and in all key questions.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Senior clinicians and managers investigated incidents thoroughly, and learning was shared, and actions taken to make improvements based on this learning to prevent recurrence and improve services. Staff understood and managed risks. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications, and experience. Whilst overall the facilities and equipment met the needs of people, it was noted that the structural fittings and finishes at the practice needed improvement to fully meet infection prevention and control standards. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes such as reducing patient opioid dependence.

Staff regularly reviewed people’s care and worked with other services to achieve this. We saw that care outcomes for patients were good, being generally either in line with or above local and national performance. The provider actively worked with patients to support healthier lifestyles.

People were involved in their care and treatment and experienced kindness and compassion. Staff protected the dignity of patients, and understood the importance of confidentiality. They treated patients as individuals and supported their preferences, and patients were involved in choices about care and treatment. The practice recognised and supported staff wellbeing and development.

People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders, managers, and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening and learning, and aimed to provide services which delivered excellent care with good continuity to the local population. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable, and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with local stakeholders and partners to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

10 Jul to 10 Jul

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Bramham Medical Centre on 15 February 2018. The overall rating for the practice was good; with a rating of requires improvement for providing safe services. The full comprehensive report for the February 2018 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Bramham Medical Centre on our website at .

In addition to the areas for improvement identified under the key question for providing safe services, at the inspection on 15 February 2018 we also said the practice should consider the following areas:

  • Continue to review and improve the function of the patient participation group.
  • Review exception reporting rates for the Quality and Outcomes Framework to assure themselves that patients are being excepted in line with the latest guidance.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 10 July 2018 to confirm that the practice had made the required improvements identified at the previous inspection on 15 February 2018. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice is rated as good.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems and processes in place to monitor usage of both printed and blank prescriptions.
  • The practice had reviewed the process for recording significant events and incidents. We saw minutes from practice meetings in which significant events had been discussed and learning had been shared with staff.
  • We saw that fabric curtains in all of the treatment rooms had been replaced with disposable ones. The practice had a system in place to ensure these were replaced every six months.
  • The practice had sourced additional training for the infection prevention and control (IPC) lead. Due to demand and staff availability, the first available course was March 2019. We saw evidence that the infection prevention and control lead had been booked to attend this course.
  • The practice had introduced a standard operating procedure to address areas of high exception reporting rates for the Quality and Outcomes Framework.
  • The practice had hosted two patient participation group meetings and was taking steps to increase interest from patients.

We saw one area where the provider should make improvements:

  • The provider should ensure that the IPC lead attends, completes and implements learning from the additional IPC training that has been booked to support them in their role.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

15 February 2018

During a routine inspection

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection October 2015 - Good)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Requires Improvement

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Bramham Medical Centre on 15 February 2018. We carried out this inspection as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey were consistently good and patient feedback we received on the day largely supported this.
  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.
  • The practice was involved in a number of local and national initiatives. For example; the locality scheme pilot for a visiting GP service over the winter period and the NHS 111 pilot scheme allowing patients to be remotely allocated to a GP appointment during hours.
  • The practice was aware of challenges facing smaller providers and were exploring options to overcome these.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to embed the new system and keep records of prescription numbers in order to monitor usage of both printed and blank prescriptions.
  • Implement fully the significant event policy and supporting reporting form in order to maintain an adequate record of learning from all significant events and incidents.
  • Arrange for the Infection Prevention and Control lead to receive additional training to support them in the role.
  • Continue to review and improve the function of the patient participation group.
  • Review exception reporting rates for the Quality and Outcomes Framework to assure themselves that patients are being excepted in line with the latest guidance.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

7 October 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Bramham Medical Centre on 7 October 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed, with the exception of those relating to fire safety checks.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

We saw several areas of outstanding practice including:

  • Weekly warfarin clinics are run at the practice to improve access to local services in the community
  • Retinal screening services are provided at the practice
  • Home visits to elderly house bound patients are provided by an additional nursing staff funded by this and four other local practices
  • The practice provided a dermoscopy service for early diagnosis and prompt referral of patients.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider should

  • Ensure adequate fire safety systems are in place and staff complete fire training and regular fire drills are in place
  • Ensure blank prescriptions pads are safely monitored
  • Ensure that pharmaceutical guidance is followed in the management of controlled drugs

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice