• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Woodlands Road Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

6 Woodlands Road, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, TS1 3BE (01642) 247982

Provided and run by:
Acklam Medical Centre

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

15 November 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Woodlands Road Surgery on 15 November 2016. We visited the main surgery on Woodlands Road, we did not visit the Acklam Road branch surgery during the inspection. The practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows;

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they were able to get same day appointments and pre bookable appointments were available.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.
  • The practice had an active virtual Patient Reference Group which worked with the practice to make improvements.

We saw an area of outstanding practice;

  • The practice operated a same day ‘Dr First’ appointment system. Each clinician managed their workflow from their telephone triage screen and appointments were booked throughout the day from 8am to 6pm. Since the introduction of the Dr First system the practice performance for unplanned admissions and attendance at A/E had improved. Before the system was introduced in January 2013 the practice was ranked seventh out of 22 for overall spend with 22 being the lowest spend practice, this included costs for unplanned admissions and attendance at A/E. At the end of October 2016 the practice was ranked 20 out of the 22 practices for overall spend; this included a reduction in the number of unplanned admissions and A/E attendances.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider should:

  • Implement a planned clinical audit programme to ensure audit cycles are completed.

  • Monitor the process for seeking consent for minor surgery procedures.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

9 October 2013

During a routine inspection

During the inspection we spoke with five patients, the business manager, one of the general practitioner's (GPs), a nurse practitioner, the health care assistant (HCA), the deputy manager and reception staff.

Patients we spoke with told us they were very happy with the care and support they received from this practice. One patient told us, 'The staff are pleasant and friendly.' Another patient told us, 'The system is ok, I can get appointments no trouble.' They also said, 'It's good care, they explain everything.'

We were able to observe the experiences of patients. We saw that staff treated patients with dignity and respect. We saw that patients had their care and treatment needs assessed and that treatment plans were in place.

We saw that there were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.

We found that training was available for staff and they received regular supervision and appraisals.

There were effective systems to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.