• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Farley Road Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

53 Farley Road, Selsdon, South Croydon, Surrey, CR2 7NG (020) 8651 1222

Provided and run by:
The Farley Road Medical Practice

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 18 August 2026. The Farley Medical Practice is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 11767 people under a contract held with NHS England. The practice has a branch site at Forestdale. Both sites were open Monday to Fridays 8am to 6.30pm. The main branch was also open alternative Saturdays from 9am to 5pm.

According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the service area is approximately 67.9% White, 13.48% Asian, 11.03% Black, 6.11% Mixed and 2.29% Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows deprivation within the service population group is in the 9th decile (9 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the service population is relative to others.

This was a focused assessment. We undertook this assessment due to the length of time since our last assessment. We assessed 10 quality statements from across all 5 key questions. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

Staff kept facilities clean and maintained equipment appropriately to ensure people were kept safe. They assessed and managed the risk of infection well and took steps to control the risk of it spreading. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience.

Staff supported people to live healthier lives, monitoring their care and treatment to ensure they received positive and consistent outcomes.

Staff treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion, and respected their privacy and dignity.

People could access care, treatment and support when they needed it. Leaders and staff were alert to discrimination and inequality that could disadvantage groups of people who used the service and sought ways to address any barriers.

The service had a clear vision and strategy, which considered the needs of the people who used their service and the wider community. Staff understood their individual roles and responsibilities. Leaders accounted for the actions, behaviours and performance of staff through clear and effective governance processes.

18 January 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Farley Road Medical Practice on 18 January 2017. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) showed patient outcomes were at or above average compared to the national average. Rates of exception reporting were generally comparable to or below local and national averages, but there were a few indicators where the practice excepted more patients than the local and national average. (Exception reporting is the removal of patients from QOF calculations where, for example, the patients are unable to attend a review meeting or certain medicines cannot be prescribed because of side effects.)

  • Rates for some childhood immunisations for under two years old were a little below the national expectation of coverage (90%).

  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • The practice carried out clinical audits, but most of these were not repeated to check for improvement.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Monitor exception rates to determine if procedures are operating effectively to identify patients who need support and those who shouldn’t be included in performance data.

  • Monitor and consider ways to maintain and improve rates of childhood immunisation.

  • Strengthen quality improvement, with more completed audits or other activities to check that improvement is made and sustained.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice