• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Grove Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

103-105 Grove Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 9BU 0844 445 2221

Provided and run by:
The Grove Medical Centre

All Inspections

28 August 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about The Grove Medical Centre on 28 August 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

2 August 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Grove Medical Centre on 25 August 2016. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. Specifically they were rated as requires improvement for safe, caring and well-led, and good for effective and responsive. The full comprehensive report on the August 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Grove Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 2 August 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 25 August 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice is now rated as good and the provision of safe, caring and well-led services are now also rated good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • The recruitment process for all staff had been reviewed and all necessary employment checks were now being carried out.
  • Robust checks were now in place in accordance with requirements noted in the Legionella risk assessment.
  • Information was available to advise patients on how to make a complaint.
  • Complaints were now being investigated and learning outcomes shared with all relevant staff.
  • Fire training had now been competed by staff at a level appropriate to their role.
  • A comprehensive and up to date business continuity plan was now in place.
  • Carers were now being actively identified and supported where necessary.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

25 August 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Grove Medical Centre on 25 August 2016. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Risks to patients were not effectively managed for example a legionella risk assessment was completed but the associated actions as a result had not been carried out.

  • Reception staff who acted as a chaperone did not have a disclosure and barring check (DBS) and there was no risk assessment carried out to mitigate risks associated with this, we did however see that these checks had recently been applied for.

  • There was an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • One reception staff member and one agency nurse did not have a reference on file.

  • The practice did not have a defibrillator on the premises at the start of our visit; however, we saw that one was purchased before the end of the inspection.

  • Staff had not received fire training.

  • The practice had low GP Survey Patient Survey scores and were not aware of the survey so plans were not put in place to improve the satisfaction scores.

  • There was no information displayed around the practice to inform patients of how to make complaints and learning from complaints was not systematically shared with staff members.

  • The practice had a business continuity plan, but this was not comprehensive or complete and did not include staff contact details.

  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available on the day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider must make improvement are:

  • Ensure recruitment arrangements include all necessary employment checks for all staff.

  • Mitigate risk associated with not carrying out the actions highlighted in the legionella risk assessment.

  • Put plans in place to improve GP Patient Survey scores.

  • Display information advising patients on how they can make a complaint and ensure the learning and outcomes from complaints are shared with all relevant staff members.

  • Ensure all staff members complete fire training appropriate to their role.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Maintain a comprehensive and up to date business continuity plan, with copies available off site.

  • Review systems for identifying carers to ensure appropriate support is provided to them.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice