• Doctor
  • GP practice

Moreton Group Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Pasture Road Health Centre, Pasture Road Moreton, Wirral, Merseyside, CH46 8SA (0151) 678 0993

Provided and run by:
Moreton Group Practice

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 23 May 2016

Moreton Group Practice is registered with CQC to provide primary care services, which include access to GPs, family planning, ante and post-natal care. The practice is based in Moreton, Wirral. There is a large car park at the front of the practice.

The practice has a Primary Medical Services (PMS) contract with a registered list size of 7126 patients (at the time of inspection). The practice has four GP partners, two male and two female, two female salaried GPs and three practice nurses. The practice is supported by a practice manager and a number of administration and reception staff.

The practice is a training practice for doctors undertaking training to become GPs.

The practice is open between 8.30am to 6:30pm Monday to Friday. Appointments are bookable in a variety of ways including on line and via the practice 24 hour automated telephone appointment system. Home visits and telephone consultations are available for patients who required them, including housebound patients and older patients. There are also arrangements to ensure patients received urgent medical assistance when the practice was closed. Out of hours patients are asked to contact the NHS 111 service to obtain healthcare advice or treatment.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 23 May 2016

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Moreton Group Practice on 31 March 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour (The duty of candour is a set of specific legal requirements that providers of services must follow when things go wrong with care and treatment).

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • The provider should continue to monitor patient satisfaction with the service provided.

  • The provider should review data held with regard to some long term conditions and produce an action plan to support better outcomes for patients.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

People with long term conditions

Good

Updated 23 May 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of people with long-term conditions.

  • Nursing staff had lead roles in chronic disease management and patients at risk of hospital admission were identified as a priority.

  • 96% of patients with diabetes had influenza immunisation compared to the national average of 94%.

  • Longer appointments and home visits were available when needed.

  • All these patients had a named GP and a structured annual review to check their health and medicines needs were being met. For those patients with the most complex needs, the named GP worked with relevant health and care professionals to deliver a multidisciplinary package of care.

Families, children and young people

Good

Updated 23 May 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of families, children and young people.

  • There were systems in place to identify and follow up children living in disadvantaged circumstances and who were at risk, for example, children and young people who had a high number of A&E attendances. Immunisation rates were high for all standard childhood immunisations.

  • 68% of patients aged 50-70, were screened for breast cancer in last 36 months compared to the CCG and national average of 72%.

  • Appointments were available outside of school hours and the premises were suitable for children and babies.

  • The practice sent out a an information sheet to new parents, offering congratulations and advice for mum and baby including contact information such as the health visiting team and national breast feeding helpline numbers.

  • We saw positive examples of joint working with midwives, health visitors and school nurses.

Older people

Good

Updated 23 May 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of older people.

  • The practice offered proactive, personalised care to meet the needs of the older people in its population.

  • The practice was involved in the CCG led over 75 years care scheme, to promote the health and wellbeing of this group of patients.

  • The practice had a system in place that allocated a named GP to visit patients living in local nursing and care homes. This system supported continuity of care for vulnerable patients.

  • The practice was responsive to the needs of older people, and offered home visits and urgent appointments for those with enhanced needs.

  • The practice conducted regular unplanned admissions register reviews to ensure patients received appropriate care and treatment at home.

Working age people (including those recently retired and students)

Good

Updated 23 May 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of working-age people (including those recently retired and students).

  • The needs of the working age population, those recently retired and students had been identified and the practice had adjusted the services it offered to ensure these were accessible, flexible and offered continuity of care. For example, GP telephone consultations for working age patients.

  • The practice was proactive in offering online services as well as a full range of health promotion and screening that reflects the needs for this age group.

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)

Good

Updated 23 May 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia).

  • 98% of patients diagnosed with dementia had their care reviewed in a face to face meeting in the last 12 months, which was higher than the national average of 84%.

  • 95% of patients with schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder and other psychoses had a comprehensive, agreed care plan documented in the record, in the preceding 12 months compared to the national average of 88%.

  • The practice regularly worked with multi-disciplinary teams in the case management of patients experiencing poor mental health, including those with dementia.

  • The practice carried out advance care planning for patients with dementia.

  • The practice had told patients experiencing poor mental health about how to access various support groups and voluntary organisations.

  • The practice had a system in place to follow up patients who had attended accident and emergency where they may have been experiencing poor mental health.

  • Staff had a good understanding of how to support patients with mental health needs and dementia.

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable

Good

Updated 23 May 2016

The practice is rated as good for the care of people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable.

  • The practice held a register of patients living in vulnerable circumstances including patients with a learning disability.

  • The practice offered longer appointments for patients with a learning disability.

  • The practice regularly worked with other health care professionals in the case management of vulnerable patients.

  • The practice informed vulnerable patients about how to access various support groups and voluntary organisations.

  • Staff knew how to recognise signs of abuse in vulnerable adults and children. Staff were aware of their responsibilities regarding information sharing, documentation of safeguarding concerns and how to contact relevant agencies in normal working hours and out of hours.