• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Balaam Street Practice

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Balaam Street Health Centre, 113 Balaam Street, Plaistow, London, E13 8AF (020) 8472 1238

Provided and run by:
Balaam Street Practice

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

2 June 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Balaam Street Practice on the 2 June 2015. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Specifically, we found the practice to require improvement for providing safe and well led services. It also required improvement for providing services for older people, people with long term-conditions, families, children and young people, working age people (including those recently retired and students), people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable and people experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia). It was good for providing effective, caring and responsive services.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed, with the exception of those relating to the availability of emergency oxygen and staff recruitment.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice did not hold regular governance meetings and issues were discussed at ad hoc meetings.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a leadership structure and staff felt supported by management.
  • The practice had not proactively sought feedback from patients through its PPG.

However, there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider must:

  • Ensure all clinical and non-clinical staff receives appropriate training in infection control and annual infection control audits are completed.
  • Ensure all staff receives basic life support training and the practice explores ways of providing access to oxygen. The National Resuscitation Council has the view that: ‘Current resuscitation guidelines emphasise the use of oxygen, and this should be available whenever possible.’ Oxygen is considered essential in dealing with certain medical emergencies (such as acute exacerbation of asthma and other causes of hypoxaemia, which is an abnormal low level of oxygen in the blood.
  • Ensure that recruitment checks have been completed for staff before the start of their employment.
  • Ensure the views of patients through its PPG (A PPG is a group of patients registered with a practice who work with the practice to improve services and the quality of care) and of stakeholders about their experiences, quality of care and treatment delivered by the service are sought.

In addition the provider should:

  • To exploring ways of increasing QOF performance.
  • To provide equality and diversity training to its staff team.
  • To hold regular staff meetings, multi-disciplinary meetings and quarterly palliative care meetings. To keep a recorded audit trail of meetings and ensure that governance issues, performance, quality and risks have been discussed.
  • To provide locum GPs with a locum induction pack.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

6 May 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

At our last inspection on 23 October 2013 we found the provider had not taken reasonable steps to protect vulnerable children and adults from the risk of abuse. The provider did not have a safeguarding adults policy in place. Non clinical staff had not received up to date training for the protection of vulnerable adults. Both clinical and non-clinical staff had not received child safeguarding training. Some staff were not able to describe the indicators of potential abuse. Some staff were not familiar with the practice's whistleblowing policy and were not able to say what they would do if they had concerns about the conduct of a doctor, for example.

At our inspection on 6 May 2014 we found the provider had made progress towards meeting this essential standard, but shortfalls remained. Staff had satisfactory awareness about safeguarding and they were able to describe the indicators of potential abuse and what actions they would take if they were concerned about someone. Some basic briefing about safeguarding children and adults had been provided by the lead doctor using a nationally recognised toolkit.

The provider had in place a plan to ensure that all staff received up to date training in safeguarding children and adults. It was anticipated the training would be delivered by the clinical commissioning group (CCG) by June 2014. The CCG also planned to provide the practice with guidance to help them to develop local safeguarding adults and separate safeguarding children's policies.

Inspectors spoke to senior officers at the CCG on the day of the visit and the CCG confirmed they planned to provide safeguarding training to the practice by June 2014.

We did not speak to people using the service as part of this inspection because of the nature of the compliance actions we were following up.

23 October 2013

During a routine inspection

People were satisfied with the care and support from both clinical and non-clinical staff. Most people we spoke to had been registered with the practice for many years. Some comments included 'both doctors listen to what you say. They are both very caring and nice people' and 'the best doctor I've ever been to'. Another said 'the nurse is lovely'.

Before people received any care or treatment they were asked for their consent and the provider acted in accordance with their wishes.

People who used the service were not sufficiently protected from risk of abuse, because the provider had not taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of the abuse of adults.

All the staff we spoke with said that they felt well supported. They said the practice manager and doctors were approachable and always happy to discuss any issues with them.

When people registered they were given an information leaflet which contained information about how to make a complaint.