• Doctor
  • GP practice

Audlem Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

16 Cheshire Street, Audlem, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 0AH (01270) 811440

Provided and run by:
Audlem Medical Practice

Assessment report published 7 May 2026

On this page

Effective

Good

28 April 2026

We looked for evidence staff involved people in decisions about their care and treatment and provided them with advice and support. Staff regularly reviewed people’s care and worked with other services to achieve this. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating remains the same.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Assessing needs

Score: 3

We did not look at Assessing needs during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

Delivering evidence-based care and treatment

Score: 3

We did not look at Delivering evidence-based care and treatment during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

How staff, teams and services work together

Score: 3

We did not look at How staff, teams and services work together during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

Supporting people to live healthier lives

Score: 3

The service always supported people to manage their health and wellbeing to fully maximise their independence, choice and control. The service supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support.

Staff focussed on identifying risks to people’s health, including those in the last 12 months of their lives and those with caring responsibilities. The practice had a dedicated social prescriber that focused on national priorities and initiatives to improve health, including stopping smoking and tackling obesity. Appointments with the social prescriber were 45 minutes and this enabled people the time to identify any needs and be supported to resolve them. We saw evidence that the service worked with the wider community and developed a website to provide welfare support to vulnerable and socially isolated adults and older people within the community.

Monitoring and improving outcomes

Score: 3

The service routinely monitored people’s care and treatment to continuously improve it. They ensured outcomes were positive, consistent and met the expectations of people themselves.

The service met national targets for the uptake of childhood immunisations. The service performed in-line with the England average in relation to several cancer screening programmes and performed above target in cancer referrals.

We did not look at Consent to care and treatment during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.