• Doctor
  • GP practice

Clement Road Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Clement Road Medical Centre, 4a Clement Road, Halesowen, West Midlands, B62 9LR (0121) 559 2044

Provided and run by:
Clement Road Medical Practice

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 13 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Clement Road Medical Practice is a GP practice and delivers services to 5873 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that 74.42% of patients registered are White, 14.23% are Asian, 4.23% are Black, 4.25% are Mixed and 2.87% are Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the fourth decile (4 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents and people were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with other practices within the Primary Care Network to ensure the best outcomes for patients. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The service supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. Feedback from patients was mixed about accessing the service provided and this was also reflected in the results of the GP National Patient Survey. The practice kept access under review and had recently recruited additional staff to support telephone access. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on safety, excellence, learning and compassion. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with other practices within the Primary Care Network (PCN) to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

12 April 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection visit of Clement Road Medical Practice in August 2016. As a result of our comprehensive inspection the practice was rated as requires improvements for providing safe services. This was because we identified areas where the provider must make improvement and also some areas where the provider should improve.

We undertook a focused inspection on 12 April 2017 to check that the provider had made improvements in line with providing safe services. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements. You can read the report from our previous inspections by selecting the 'all reports' link for Clement Road Medical Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • During our comprehensive inspection on 25 August 2016 we found that the practice could not demonstrate that the nurses also received safety alerts. When observing the alerts process during our follow up inspection we saw that alerts were disseminated across the whole practice team and acted on where required.
  • When we inspected the practice in 2016 we found that systems were not effective across all areas such as following up on child missed appointments at hospital. As part of our most recent inspection, we noted that there was a process for monitoring and following up on missed hospital appointments, for adult and child patients. However, we found that the GPs did not always keep a record to evidence when they had reviewed the missed hospital appointments.
  • Previously we found that risk had not been assessed in the absence of emergency medicine associated with minor surgery and fitting specific contraceptive devices. We also found that regular fire alarm tests and fire drills had not taken place in the practice. During our follow up inspection we observed adequate stock of emergency medicine suitable for the practice and the services provided. Records were kept to demonstrate that the fire alarm was frequently tested and we saw that a fire drill had recently taken place.
  • When we inspected the practice in August 2016, we identified an area where the practice should improve with regards to supporting carers. During our follow up inspection we noted significant improvement and due to staff taking an active approach in identifying carers, we found that the carers register had increased from 3% to 4% between August 2016 and April 2017. These carers were offered support, flexible appointments and flu vaccinations.
  • For instance, due to staff taking an active approach to identifying carers we found that the carers register had increased from 3% to 4% between August 2016 and April 2017. Flu vaccinations were offered to carers and carers were included in the programme for flu vaccinations to ensure that they were contacted and offered a flu vaccine.
  • Since our previous inspection, comprehensive carer packs had been developed by the practice; these packs were handed out to all carers. The packs contained a wide range of information including signpost information to various carer support groups, this included support for young carers; to help the young carers identified on the practices register.

We identified one area of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • Improve record keeping specifically when reviewing missed hospital appointments, to reflect the system used in practice when reviewing and following up on missed hospital appointments.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

25 August 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Clement Road Medical Practice on 25 August 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • We observed a patient-centred culture and we saw that staff treated patients with kindness and respect. Patients we spoke with and the completed comment cards we received described staff as helpful, caring and respectful.
  • The practice was proactive in identifying and managing significant events. Opportunities for learning from internal and external incidents were maximised.
  • The practice had some systems and processes in place to keep people safe and safeguarded from abuse however these were not always effective across all areas. The practice did not actively review or follow up on children who had missed hospital appointments. Additionally, the practice could not demonstrate that nurses received medicines and device alerts.
  • We found that in in some areas governance arrangements were not always fully effective. Although policies and documented protocols were well organised and easily accessible to staff, we found that some of the policies were not current and not practice specific.
  • There were some records in place to the support the practices arrangements for identifying, recording and managing risks. However, we found that records were not kept to support that regular fire alarm tests and fire drills had taken place in the practice and the practice had not assessed the risk in the absence of emergency medicine associated with minor surgery and fitting specific contraceptive devices.
  • A programme of continuous clinical and internal audit was used to monitor quality and to make improvements. We saw that performance data across areas such as diabetes, dementia and mental health had gradually improved over the last 12 months.
  • Although 3% of the practice list had been identified as carers, we found that the practice did not always take a proactive approach to ensure that carers were always supported.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure that child safeguarding is robust, ensure that missed hospital appointments are reviewed and followed up where required.
  • Ensure that all relevant staff members receive medicine alerts and medical device alerts.
  • Ensure that fire risk is well managed and ensure that records are kept to demonstrate that fire alarms are regularly tested and that fire drills take place.
  • Improve risk management, ensure risk is assessed in the absence of emergency medicine associated with minor surgery and fitting specific contraceptive devices.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Ensure governance arrangements are robust, policies must be practice specific, well embedded and reflect current guidelines.
  • Maximise opportunities to support carers and ensure that supportive information is available in an accessible format.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice