• Doctor
  • GP practice

The New Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

264 Brentwood Road, Romford, Essex, RM2 5SU (01708) 478800

Provided and run by:
The New Medical Centre

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The New Medical Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The New Medical Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

28 November 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused assessment of The New Medical Centre 28 November 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as good.

Safe - not inspected, rating of good carried forward from previous inspection.

Effective - not inspected, rating of good carried forward from previous inspection.

Caring - not inspected, rating of good carried forward from previous inspection.

Responsive – Requires Improvement

Well-led - not inspected, rating of good carried forward from previous inspection.

Following our previous inspection in March 2019 the practice was rated good overall and for all key questions.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The New Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection.

We carried out this assessment as part of our work to understand how practices are working to try to meet peoples demands for access and to better understand the experiences of people who use services and providers.

We recognise the work that GP practices have been engaged in to continue to provide safe, quality care to the people they serve. We know staff are carrying this out whilst the demand for general practice remains exceptionally high, with more appointments being provided than ever. However, this challenging context, access to general practice remains a concern for people.

Our strategy makes a commitment to deliver regulation driven by people’s needs and experiences of care. These assessments of the responsive key question include looking at what practices are doing innovatively to improve patient access to primary care and sharing this information to drive improvement.

How we carried out the review

This assessment was carried out remotely. It did not include a site visit.

The process included:

• Conducting an interview with the provider and members of staff using video conferencing.

• Reviewing patient feedback from a range of sources

• Requesting evidence from the provider.

• Reviewing data, we hold about the provider.

• Seeking information/feedback from relevant stakeholders

Our findings

We based our judgement of the responsive key question on a combination of:

• what we found when we met with the provider

• information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and

• information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • The practice had responded to patient feedback about access and had started to make changes. However, the practice patient feedback regarding access has remained below the national average since 2019.
  • The practice used a triage system where reception staff prioritised patients and directed them to the most suitable clinician. However, there was no evidence some staff had completed training and no effective guidance for them to follow.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Take action to ensure staff who work in reception have completed satisfactory training.
  • Take action to implement effective triage and prioritisation guidance for staff to follow.
  • Continue to respond to patient feedback and improve patient access.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

3 March 2019 to 3 March 2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused inspection at The New Medical Centre on 3 April 2019.

At this inspection we followed up on breaches of regulations identified at a previous inspection on 4 October 2017. Where the practice was found Good overall and for the domains, safe, effective, caring, well led and for all of the population groups. With the exception of responsive where it was found to require improvement.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of: -

  • what we found when we inspected,
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services,
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good for providing a good service for all of the population groups in responsive and responsive overall. This is because: -

  • The practice has complied with the breaches of regulation found during the inspection of 4 October 2017.
  • The practice has taken steps to review the GP patient survey and respond to its findings. It has made changes to the service to ensure that patients access to service improved.
  • The practice now monitored and responded to NHS Choices comments.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care.

4 October 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The New Medical Centre on 12 January 2017. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. We rated the practice overall requires improvement due to lack of governance issues particularly in relation to low Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) scores and low National GP Patient Survey scores. The full comprehensive report on the January 2017 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The New Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was undertaken following the January 2017 inspection was an announced comprehensive inspection on 4 October 2017. Overall the practice is now rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Not all of the patients we received feedback from said they found it easy to make an appointment with the practice.
  • Results from the National GP Patient Survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns and this learning was shared with all members of staff.
  • Patients and carers of patients with life-limiting conditions had been identified by the practice and were holders of the practice ‘Goldcard’.The ‘Goldcard’ allowed easy access to clinical services at the practice.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • Patients rated their overall experience at the practice lower than the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and national averages.
  • There was a leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • Continuous improvement was encouraged by the partners. We saw examples of support to staff to undertake studies to gain further knowledge as well as the practice taking part in a local pilot which would help identify a potential new way of processing patient data.

The areas of practice where the provider should make improvements are:-

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care, in particular with regards to addressing continuing patient concerns highlighted in the National GP Patient Survey scores.
  • Continue to review how patients with caring responsibilities are identified and recorded on the clinical system to ensure information, advice and support is available to them.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

12 January 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The New Medical Centre on 12 January 2017. Overall the practice is rated as Requires Improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Not all of the patients we received feedback from said they found it easy to make an appointment with the practice.
  • Results from the National GP Patient Survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns; however this learning was not shared with all members of staff.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • Patients rated their overall experience at the practice lower than the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and national averages.
  • There was a leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.
  • Data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) showed patient outcomes were below the CCG and the national averages.

The area where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure effective and sustainable governance systems and processes are implemented to monitor the practice performance and the quality of services provided, in particular in relation to establishing an action plan to address the low Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scores achieved by the practice.

In addition the provider should:

  • Ensure that all members of staff conduct information governance training.
  • Devise an action plan to address patient concerns as highlighted by low scores contained within the National GP Patient Survey.
  • Ensure joined up working between the partners and the practice management in order that all aspects of practice governance and performance are viewed as a whole.
  • Devise a system to regularly monitor unplanned admissions of patients on the practice list.
  • Review how patients with caring responsibilities are identified and recorded on the clinical system to ensure information, advice and support is available to them.
  • Ensuring that prescription forms are securely stored at all times.
  • Share learning gained from significant events and complaints with all staff.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice