• Doctor
  • GP practice

Darlaston Medical Centre Dr Ali and Dr Syed Surgery Also known as Darlaston Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Surgery, Birmingham Street, Walsall Road, Darlaston, Wednesbury, West Midlands, WS10 9JS (0121) 526 7151

Provided and run by:
Darlaston Medical Centre Dr Ali and Dr Syed Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Darlaston Medical Centre Dr Ali and Dr Syed Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Darlaston Medical Centre Dr Ali and Dr Syed Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

4 February 2020

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Darlaston Medical Centre Dr Ali and Dr Syed Surgery on 4 February 2020. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

10 October 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We previously carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of Darlaston Medical Centre Dr Ali and Dr Syed Surgery on 9 August 2016. A total of three breaches of legal requirements were found and the practice was rated as requires improvement overall.

We issued requirement notices in relation to:

  • Regulation 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014. Safe care and treatment.
  • Regulation 13 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014. Safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment.
  • Regulation 17 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 Good governance.

You can read the report from the comprehensive inspection on 9 August 2016 by selecting the 'all reports' link for Darlaston Medical Centre Dr Ali and Dr Syed Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

We undertook an announced comprehensive inspection on 10 October 2017 to check that the practice now met legal requirements. Overall the practice is now rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • The practice had made improvements to the safety systems and processes in place to minimise risks to patient safety. Processes were in place to ensure that repeat prescriptions for high risk medicines were monitored and that patients had regular reviews and blood monitoring.
  • The practice had reviewed the emergency medicine available to the staff and the full range of emergency medicines was now available.
  • The practice had strengthened their procedures to follow up children who failed to attend hospital appointments and had introduced an electronic template to assist staff to record relevant information.
  • A legionella risk assessment had been completed and regular monitoring was taking place.
  • Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect although
  • Information about services and how to complain was available. The practice had introduced a system for recording and acting upon verbal complaints.
  • Patients told us that they were able to get appointments when they needed them. They told us both emergency and routine appointments were available, although they may have to wait for an appointment with their GP of choice.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs. The practice had invested in a hearing loop system.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • Improvements had been made to the governance procedures in place, including the follow up of children who did not attend appointments.
  • The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider should make improvements.

The provider should:

  • Consider reviewing and updating the fire risk assessment.
  • Ensure evidence of completed induction programmes is available.
  • Review the results of the national GP patient survey regarding patient satisfaction with their interactions with GPs.
  • Consider providing information leaflets in different languages.
  • Consider developing a practice meetings schedule.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

9 August 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Darlaston Medical Centre Dr Ali Surgery on 9 August 2016. Overall, the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events. However, the recording and analyses of investigations were not thorough enough. For example, although lessons learned and actions to mitigate risks of further incidents was discussed during practice meetings completed incident forms did not include subsequent actions the practice intended to take to reduce the risk of recurrence.

  • Safeguarding policies and processes were in place however, they were not consistently followed. For example, the practice process for following up children who had not attended hospital appointments was not always followed.

  • Some systems were in place to assess and manage risks to patients, with the exception of risks associated with the premises; and in the absence of some medicines to treat certain medical emergencies the practice had not carried out a risk assessment.
  • Patients in receipt of medicines, which required closer monitoring, were not always receiving a review of their treatment in line with prescribing recommendations.
  • Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. Staff had access to training and support to ensure they maintained the required skills, knowledge and experience.
  • Clinical audits demonstrated sustained quality improvement and the practice participated in local pilots.
  • The national GP survey showed patients’ responses varied on some aspects of care. Patients spoken with on the day said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect. Patients felt involved in their care and decisions about their treatment. Completed Care Quality Commission comment cards were consistent with these views.
  • On the day of the inspection patients said, they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day. However, the national GP patient survey showed that patient’s satisfaction with how they could access care and treatment was below the national average.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

The areas where the provider must make improvement are:

  • In the absence of some emergency medicines, the practice must carry out a risk assessment in order to mitigate potential risks.
  • Implement an effective system to improve the monitoring of high-risk medications and ensure reviews are carried out as part of, and align with, patients care and treatment plans and published guidance.
  • Ensure the practice safeguarding procedures are followed to ensure where appropriate staff are following up children who had not attended hospital appointments.
  • Establish and operate an effective system to assess, monitor and mitigate risks relating to the health, safety and welfare of service users and others who may be at risk, which arise from the carrying on of the regulated activity. For example, the practice must gain assurance that an appropriate legionella assessment and identified actions has been carried out.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Consider how clinical audit cycles may further improve patient outcomes.
  • Continue to liaise with the property owners to gain assurance that identified building repairs are carried out to completion.
  • Continue reviewing the uptake of childhood immunisations and consider ways to further promote.
  • Consider how in the absence of a hearing loop they ensure effective communication with patients with hearing difficulties.
  • Consider how maintaining a record of verbal complaints and recording actions taken can support further learning.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

9 August 2016

During an inspection of this service