• Doctor
  • GP practice

St Saviours Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

St. Saviours Surgery, Merick Road, Malvern, Worcestershire, WR14 1DD (01684) 572323

Provided and run by:
St Saviours Surgery

Assessment report published 28 September 2026

On this page

Effective

Good

17 September 2026

We looked for evidence that staff monitored people’s care and treatment and supported them to live healthier lives. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating remains the same.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Assessing needs

Score: 3

We did not look at Assessing needs during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

Delivering evidence-based care and treatment

Score: 3

We did not look at Delivering evidence-based care and treatment during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

How staff, teams and services work together

Score: 3

We did not look at How staff, teams and services work together during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.

Supporting people to live healthier lives

Score: 3

The service supported people to manage their health and wellbeing to maximise their independence, choice and control. The service supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support.

The practice ensured staff remained up to date with current guidance and best practice through regular communications and updates, enabling them to provide patients with appropriate advice, support and care based on the latest recommendations. The service had invested in an automatic recall system for patients with long-term conditions to encourage attendance for routine reviews and clinical monitoring. Staff were able to refer patients to a diabetes prevention programme that included dietary and lifestyle education and advice.

Staff focussed on identifying risks to people’s health, including those in the last 12 months of their lives and those with caring responsibilities. Staff supported national priorities and initiatives to improve population health, including stopping smoking and tackling obesity. The social prescriber from the primary care network was utilised by the practice. They were able to provide a vast range of support from supporting people’s mental and physical health.

Monitoring and improving outcomes

Score: 3

The service routinely monitored people’s care and treatment to continuously improve it. They ensured outcomes were positive, consistent and met the expectations of people themselves.

At the time of our assessment, the latest published information from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) showed that the practice mostly achieved the World Health Organisation target of 95% for the number of children immunised against various infectious childhood diseases except for children aged 5 who had received immunisation for measles, mumps and rubella. However, due to the practice’s small patient population, a single child not receiving the vaccination had a significant impact on the overall percentage achievement. The practice assured us they were engaging with non-attenders.

The latest published information from NHS Digital showed the practice’s uptake for cervical cancer screening met the 80% national target for women aged 50 to 64 years old. However, it was observed at 78.2% for women aged 25 to 49 years old. The practice told us they had taken steps to increase the cervical screening uptake. For example, people received multiple invites and staff used opportunities during routine consultations to encourage eligible patients to attend and raise awareness of the importance of screening. Audits were completed to monitor and improve the quality of care.

We did not look at Consent to care and treatment during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Effective.