• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Park Lodge Medical Centre

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

3 Old Park Road, Palmers Green, London, N13 4RG (020) 8886 6866

Provided and run by:
Park Lodge Medical Centre

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

31 March 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Park Lodge Medical Centre on 31 March 2016. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Patients always received a verbal and written apology.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.

  • Urgent appointments were available on the day they were requested.
  • The practice had proactively sought feedback from patients and had an active patient participation group.
  • Risks to patients were not all well managed, in particular, the practice was deficient in regard to: recruitment checks; chaperone training; disclosure and barring service checks; safeguarding training; infection control training; failing to act on recommendations in its fire risk assessment; basic life support training for all staff; failing to act on recommendations in its legionella report; and it did not have a defibrillator on the premises or a suitable risk assessment of the need for one.
  • Data showed patient outcomes were low compared to the locality and nationally. However, audits had been carried out, and we saw evidence that audits were driving improvement in performance to improve patient outcomes.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure that recruitment arrangements include all necessary employment checks for all staff, and that staff follow a suitable induction programme following appointment, and thereafter receive appropriate professional development, supervision, and appraisals, as necessary to enable them to carry out their duties.

  • Ensure that staff receive appropriate training and updates, including: chaperone training for all non-clinical staff who act as chaperones; safeguarding of vulnerable children and adults; basic life support training; and infection control.

  • Ensure that all staff undergo Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks or have a suitable risk assessment in place.

  • Ensure that it addresses concerns identified in regard to: infection prevention and control including legionella assessments; and fire risk assessment including holding fire drills
  • Ensure that there is a defibrillator available on the premises in the event of a medical emergency, or carry out a suitable risk assessment.

In addition the provider should:

  • Review its QOF achievement (Quality and Outcomes Framework) (QOF rewards practices for the provision of 'quality care' and helps to fund further improvements in the delivery of clinical care) to identify ways to improve patient treatment.

  • Review provision for non-urgent appointments to meet patient demand.

  • Review how it identifies and records patients with caring responsibilities.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

15 May 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This visit was a follow up to our inspection of the practice on 21 January 2014.

We had found that there was no effective system in place to assess the risk of health care associated infections and to prevent, detect and control their spread. The staff member who had been appointed as Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) lead for the practice had not had training to acquire the appropriate knowledge and skills to undertake this role. There had not been any recent infection control audits or risk assessments for the practice.

Following our inspection in January, the provider sent us a plan of the actions intended to meet the requirements of Regulation 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. We carried out this visit to check that the actions in that plan had been implemented.

We found that the provider had taken appropriate action and was now compliant with the regulations.

21 January 2014

During a routine inspection

Patients expressed their views and were involved in making decisions about their care and treatment. Patients told us they were able to express their preference for a particular hospital. We spoke with seven patients who were registered at the medical centre. They all told us that they felt able to openly discuss the reason for their visit with the GPs or nurses and that they were given appropriate information on any treatment required. One patient told us "I feel my doctor really cares not just about my health but my general wellbeing.'

We spoke with seven patients and a carer of a patient during our visit. Patients told us they were satisfied with the service they received from their GP. A patient described the service as "excellent, its run well here" and another patient told us "I think this is a very good practice, I wouldn't change."

Care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure patient's safety and welfare. Assessments of patients' needs were undertaken and recorded. A patient told us "they have been caring and sensitive. They are very empathetic and get to know their patients.'

There had been no recent infection control audits or risk assessments for the practice to date. This meant that there was no effective system in place to assess the risk of and to prevent, detect and control the spread of health care associated infections. The Infection prevention and control IPC lead for the practice required appropriate knowledge and skills to be responsible for IPC and had not had any training to undertake this role.

Appropriate arrangements were in place in relation to obtaining, handling, storing, and prescribing medicines.