The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Willerby and Swanland Surgery Also known as Willerby Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

45 Main Street, Willerby, Hull, Humberside, HU10 6BP (01482) 652652

Provided and run by:
Willerby and Swanland Surgery

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

10 December 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Willerby and Swanland Surgery on 10 December 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

19 July 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Willerby and Swanland Surgery on 19 July 2016. We visited the main surgery in Willerby and the branch surgery at Swanland during the inspection. The practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows;

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they were able to get same day appointments and pre bookable appointments were available.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider should:

  • Implement a process so that a written record is kept of references for new staff.

  • Implement a process for the GPs to complete mandatory training at required intervals.

  • Carry out fire drills at required frequencies.

  • Undertake planned individual appraisal discussions with all staff.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice