• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Station Practice

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Station Plaza Health Centre, Station Approach, Hastings, East Sussex, TN34 1BA (01424) 464756

Provided and run by:
The Station Practice

Important: We are carrying out a review of quality at The Station Practice. We will publish a report when our review is complete. Find out more about our inspection reports.

All Inspections

29 April 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at The Station Practice between 27 April 2022 and 29 April 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Requires Improvement.

The key questions are rated as:

Safe - Requires Improvement

Effective - Good

Caring - Good

Responsive - Good

Well-led – Requires Improvement

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Station Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

At our last inspection of The Station Practice on 10 August 2021 we found significant concerns in the management of medicines and the provision of appropriate healthcare monitoring of patients. We took urgent action to impose conditions for the breaches of regulation. This inspection was a comprehensive inspection to follow up on these breaches of regulation.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A site visit

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement overall

We found that:

  • The practice had taken significant steps to address concerns raised at the last inspection, to ensure they provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • The practice had improved systems to review patients prescribed high risk medicines and who were diagnosed with long term conditions.
  • The provider had kept CQC informed through the submission of a monthly action plan, in compliance with their conditions of registration.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of person-centred care.
  • The practice had undertaken significant work to address the backlog of correspondence and test results found at our last inspection. Failsafe measures were in place to reduce the risk of any future reoccurrence.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services because:

  • Whilst we identified significant improvement, some concerns remained around the monitoring and prescribing of patients’ medicines, including those that were high risk. The changes made had not been fully embedded.
  • Staff vaccination was not maintained in line with current national guidance relevant to their role.
  • Action plans for health and safety, fire and legionella risks assessments were not in place in the practice.

We rated the practice as requires improvement for providing well-led services because:

  • There had been significant improvement since our last inspection to address concerns.
  • Leaders had demonstrated that they had a credible strategy to develop sustainable care.
  • However, at this inspection we identified concerns around clinical governance.
  • Health and safety risk assessments were not always accurate and managed in a way that provided appropriate reassurances that actions had been taken.

We found breaches of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure that care and treatment is provided in a safe way.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

The provider should:

  • Keep under review and act where necessary to respond to patient feedback and experience on access to services.
  • Establish further means to gather patient views including the establishment of the patient participation group (PPG).
  • Continue to monitor the uptake of childhood immunisations and cervical screening.
  • Keep staffing levels under review.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

13/07/2021, 05/08/2021 and 10/08/2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced review at The Station Practice between 13 July 2021 and 10 August 2021.

Following our previous inspection on 14 January 2019, the practice was rated Good overall and for providing safe, responsive, caring and well-led services but requires improvement for providing effective services.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Station Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this review

This review was in response to concerns and was conducted without undertaking a site visit inspection.

How we carried out the review

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our reviews differently.

This review was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend no time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that did not keep patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm. For example, high risk medicines were not always monitored in accordance with national guidelines.
  • Patients did not always receive appropriate clinical review and the required healthcare checks were not always carried out.
  • The practice had a backlog of correspondence and patient information that had not been dealt with. No system had been implemented to manage this backlog and provide assurances that urgent information had been prioritised for action.

We found breaches of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients
  • Ensure there is an effective system for identifying, receiving, recording, handling and responding to practice correspondence and patient information.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

14 January 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Station Practice on 14 January 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and good for all population groups.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs. However, patients with poor mental health did not always have a care plan and performance around this was worse than in 2015 when it was highlighted in our inspection report as an area the practice should improve.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
  • The majority of staff felt supported by leaders within the practice, however, some staff felt they weren’t listened to.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

  • The practice had identified a higher than average proportion of patients prescribed benzodiazepines, opiates and other strong pain killers. A high proportion of these patients had transferred from a local practice that closed at the end of 2017 and there were high numbers of patients with mental health issues or a history of substance misuse. The practice had developed a pain toolkit and set up a project involving one of the GPs, a practice pharmacist and a specialist on dependence forming medicines. Data from the first six months of the project showed evidence of successful cessation and reduction plans for 59% of patients and there was evidence of quality of life improvement as a result.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Improve the performance around mental health indicators and long-term conditions.
  • Improve the recording of smoking status of patients.
  • Review action taken as a result of staff concerns and improve engagement mechanisms.
  • Continue to monitor and improve patient access to the practice by phone.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

15 April 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Station Practice on 15 April 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found that they could often make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • To review the need for an updated DBS check as soon as clinical staff are employed.

  • To identify methods of improving Quality and Outcome Framework figures for mental health indicators.

  • To ensure that feedback from patients and staff is obtained and acted upon to drive improvement. This should include general satisfaction with the service and access to telephone lines and appointments.

  • To consider further training for reception staff with the aim of improving patient satisfaction levels with the service.

  • To consider and action ways to increase the identification of carers.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice