The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

The Streatfield Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

The Medical Centre, 177 Streatfield Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA3 9BL (020) 8204 5561

Provided and run by:
The Streatfield Medical Centre

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Streatfield Medical Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Streatfield Medical Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

14 August 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about The Streatfield Medical Centre on 14 August 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

27/10/2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Streatfield Medical Centre on 27 October 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment. Data from the National GP Patient Survey was above the CCG and national averages for several aspects of care.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Ensure the guidelines for the correct segregation and disposal of sharps waste is followed in line legislation.
  • Review how carers are identified and recorded on the clinical system to ensure information, advice and support is made available to them.


Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

8 January 2014

During a routine inspection

During our inspection, we spoke with six people who used the service, three of which were members of the Patient Participation Group (PPG). We also spoke with six members of staff which included two GPs, a nurse, the practice manager and two receptionists.

Overall people we spoke with were satisfied with the care provided. One person told us "The doctors are very good. They listen and pay attention to what I say. They are not dismissive' and 'The waiting area is clean and welcoming'. Another person said that they were '100% satisfied' with the service provided and had no complaints.

People were keen to praise the practice and were positive about members of staff at the practice.

All people we spoke with told us that they were involved in the care they had received. We saw that there were practices in place to ensure people experienced care and treatment that met their needs.

Staff we spoke with were aware of the signs of abuse and the action to take when responding to allegations or incidents of abuse. We observed that the provider had the necessary safeguarding policies in place.

Patients were cared for in a clean, hygienic environment and all people we spoke with told us that they found the practice to be clean.

We found that the provider had taken steps to ensure staff were appropriately qualified, skilled and experienced for their jobs.

We saw evidence that the provider had an effective system in place to monitor quality and safety.