• Doctor
  • GP practice

Princess Road Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

471-475 Princess Road, Withington, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M20 1BH (0161) 445 7805

Provided and run by:
Princess Road Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Princess Road Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Princess Road Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

3 December 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Princess Road Surgery on 3 December 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

27 October 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Princess Road Surgery on 16 June 2016. At the inspection in June the overall rating for the practice was good, although the key question Safe was rated requires improvement. This was because the arrangements in respect of the management of significant events, recruitment records and staff appraisal all required improvement. The full comprehensive report on the November 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Princess Road Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was a desk-based review carried out on 27 October 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breach in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 16 June 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to that requirement.

The practice is now rated as good for providing safe services, and overall the practice remains rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Since the previous inspection the practice had taken action to strengthen the arrangements in response to significant event and incident recording. Logs were maintained of each significant event or incident and these detailed what the issue was, and what action was taken in response to the concern.
  • Team meeting minutes showed that significant events and incidents were discussed with staff at these meetings.
  • Evidence supplied showed the practice undertook a review of significant events to evaluate the actions that were implemented to ensure these were effective.
  • The practice had reviewed its recruitment policy and this was up to date and was supported by a recruitment policy document for clinical staff.
  • Evidence supplied demonstrated appropriate recruitment records were obtained for staff recruited since April 2013 and these included a Curriculum Vitae, references, disclosure and barring service checks (DBS), evidence of right to work in this country and proof of address.
  • Recruitment records were also now available for locum GPs used by the practice and this included evidence of professional registration and liability insurance.
  • Since the previous inspection the practice supplied evidence demonstrating that all staff had received an appraisal and a schedule for future appraisals was recorded.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

16 June 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 16 June 2016.

Overall the practice is rated as good. Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were generally assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

There were areas of practice where the provider must make improvements:

  • Introduce effective procedures for reporting, recording, acting on significant events, incidents and near misses and ensure that learning is shared with all relevant staff.
  • Ensure documented evidence of staff appraisals and training is available.
  • Ensure the recruitment of all staff includes all the necessary employment checks and records are kept of these.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice