• Doctor
  • GP practice

Nettlebed Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Wanbourne Lane, Nettlebed, Henley On Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 5AJ (01491) 641204

Provided and run by:
Nettlebed Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Nettlebed Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Nettlebed Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

2 August 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Nettlebed Surgery on 2 August 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

The evidence provided by the practice, enabled the commission to conduct this inspection without the need for a visit.

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

In February 2016, during our previous comprehensive inspection of Nettlebed Surgery, we found issues relating to the safe delivery of healthcare services at this practice. As a result of this inspection, we asked the practice to make further improvements; in order to ensure that sharps are disposed of in the correct colour coded bags and bins. (Sharps refers to a medical term used for devices with sharp points or edges that can puncture the skin, for example needles).

We also found that the practice did not have a comprehensive risk assessment for the process of dispensing and delivering medicines to locations other than the practice. Furthermore, the practice had not carried out a legionella risk assessment and plan. The practice also needed to ensure that all staff had carried out appropriate training in infection control, and equality and diversity, and that all training was recorded. Finally at our previous inspection, we also found that the practice needed to implement a process for documenting that action plans for significant events have been carried out.

Following the last inspection, the practice was rated as requiring improvement in safe services, and good for effective, caring, responsive and well led services. The practice had an overall rating of good.

We carried out a desk based inspection in November 2016 to ensure the practice had made improvements since our last inspection. The practice sent us evidence in the form of letters to patients, a copy of a training matrix, evidence of their legionella risk assessment, and minutes from a significant events meeting, to demonstrate the range of improvements they had made, since our last visit. The practice also further supplied a chart outlining the areas the practice had attempted to improve. We found the practice had made improvements since our last inspection in February 2016.

At this inspection we found that:

  • The practice advised us that appropriate steps had been taken to ensure, that all sharps were disposed of in the correct colour coded bags and bins.

  • Following the last inspection, the practice had ceased the delivery of all medications to rural collection points.

  • The practice had produced a summary of their legionella risk assessment, and had provided evidence that this was now being followed.

  • The practice had a training matrix detailing the various courses staff had undertaken. The training matrix included infection control and equality and diversity training for all three GPs.

  • The practice had supplied minutes from a significant event meeting to demonstrate the learning in place for such events.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to improve the systems used to document training and significant events.

  • Ensure all members of staff receive equality and diversity training and clinical staff receive infection control training.

Following this desk based inspection we have rated the practice as good for providing safe services. The overall rating for the practice remains good. This report should be read in conjunction with the full inspection report of 17 February 2016. A copy of the full inspection report can be found at www.cqc.org.uk.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

17 February 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Nettlebed Surgery on 17 February 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events. However, there was not a process for documenting that action plans had been carried out.
  • Risks to patients were not always assessed and well managed in relation to staff training, storage of clinical waste, medicines management, and legionella.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff delivered effective care and treatment.
  • The practice indicated that 41% of patients aged 15 to 25 years had been screened for chlamydia in the past 12 months and 59% of people over 60 years have had bowel cancer screening. This was in line with CCG averages (59%) and national averages (58%) for bowel cancer screening.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • The practice provided excellent support and information for carers and raised awareness of sources of carer support available.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

  • The practice provided excellent support and information for carers and raised awareness of sources of carer support available. A Carer Awareness day was held at the practice annually. Scores on the National GP patient survey 2015 and 2016 were strongly positive and consistently higher than local and national averages and reflected high levels of patient satisfaction with care.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Ensure that sharps are disposed of in the correct colour coded bags and bins.
  • Develop a comprehensive risk assessment and plan for the process of dispensing and delivering medicines to locations other than the practice for patient collection.
  • Carry out a legionella risk assessment and plan.
  • Ensure that all staff have carried out appropriate training in infection control, and equality and diversity and that all training is recorded.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Implement a process for documenting that action plans for significant events have been carried out.

Professor Steve Field

CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice

14 July 2014

During a routine inspection

Nettlebed Surgery is a GP practice located in the village of Nettlebed, Oxfordshire. The practice provides primary medical services to other major areas, which include Sonning Common, Checkendon, Stonor, Pishill and Assendons. The practice has over 3400 registered patients and is a dispensing practice providing dispensing services to 90% of their registered patients. The practice team consists of two GP partners, a salaried GP, three practice nurses, a dispenser, a practice manager and an administration team. This was the first inspection since registration.

The patients we spoke with were complimentary of the services they received from the practice. The feedback received through patient comment cards was also positive.

The practice provided services which were safe. Systems were in place for reporting and responding to incidents. All safety alerts were dealt with by the GPs and nurses and reception team. The practice had comprehensive safeguarding policies and procedures in place to protect vulnerable patients.

The practice provided services which were effective. Care and treatment to patients was delivered in line with recognised best practice. The practice achieved high results against the national Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), for 2012/13. These included the clinical, organisational, additional services and patient experience domains. The QOF was introduced in 2004 as part of the general medical services contract and is a voluntary scheme for GP practices in the UK. Please note that when referring to information throughout this report, for example any reference to the Quality and Outcomes Framework data, this relates to the most recent information available to the CQC at that time.

The practice was responsive to meeting patient’s needs. A range of clinics and services were offered to patients, which included family planning, antenatal, child immunisation and nurse specialist clinics for long-term conditions. Interpreters were used for patients who did not speak English. Patients we spoke with told us appointments were easy to arrange. Staff were caring and kind and treated patients with respect and dignity.

All staff demonstrated a caring approach. Patients were positive about the care they received. The practice had measures in place to preserve patient privacy and confidentiality.

The practice was well led. There was also clear evidence of accountability for clinical practice seen. The practice had appointed leads in various areas, such as safeguarding, infection control, clinical and information governance. The practice had achieved 100% score in the QOF results in 2012/13 for the patient experience domain.

The practice had systems in place to support specific population groups: older people, people with long term conditions, mothers with babies, children and young people, the working-age population and those recently retired, people in vulnerable circumstances who may have poor access to primary care, people experiencing mental health problems. Patients in all these groups were seen by the practice.

Home visits were arranged for frail and elderly patients. GPs and Nurses signposted elderly patients to various activities provided in the local village. The practice held regular clinics for long terms conditions such as diabetes and asthma. This was to ensure conditions were monitored to help manage symptoms and prevent long term problems. The practice ran various clinics to support the mothers, babies and young children patient group. These included antenatal care, family planning and child immunisation clinics. The practice supported patients who were not able to attend due to work commitments, by offering telephone advice. There were no barriers for patients in vulnerable circumstances. Patients wishing to register at the practice were always accepted. Home visits were provided to patients with mobility difficulties. Patients with mental health care needs had regular appointments with the practice nurse for tests to manage their medicines. The practice held regular counselling clinics.

The practice provides services from:

Nettlebed Surgery, Wanbourne Lane,

Nettlebed, Henley-On-Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 5AJ.