• Doctor
  • GP practice

Archived: Catherine House Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

New Walk, The Plains, Totnes, Devon, TQ9 5HA (01803) 862073

Provided and run by:
Catherine House Surgery

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

17 July 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Catherine House Surgery on 17 July 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

19 January 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Catherine House Surgery on 19 January 2016. Overall the practice is rated as Good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents and near misses. All opportunities for learning from internal and external incidents were maximised.
  • The practice used innovative and proactive methods to improve patient outcomes, working with other local providers to share best practice.
  • All feedback from patients about their care was consistently and strongly positive. This included face to face feedback, written comments and online national surveys.
  • The practice worked closely with local charity organisations and with the local community in planning how services were provided to ensure that they meet patients’ needs.
  • The practice implemented suggestions for improvements and made changes to the way it delivered services as a consequence of feedback from patients and from the patient participation group. For example, PPG members told us that the practice had consulted them about the extended hours offered.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs. Information about how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • The practice had a clear vision which had quality and safety as its top priority. The strategy to deliver this vision had been produced with stakeholders and was regularly reviewed and discussed with staff.

We identified areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice faced challenges in providing childhood immunisations in an area where many patients favoured an alternative lifestyle. The practice had overcome these obstacles to raise its vaccination rate for 2 year olds from 78% in January 2014 to 93% in July 2015. The practice had also increased the meningitis C five in one childhood immunisations in the same period from 81% to 96%. These were significant achievements in this geographical area and above the national averages.
  • The practice met up bi-monthly to discuss the top 20 most at risk patients. These meetings included practice GPs, the community matron, social services, physiotherapists and mental health team.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

9 July 2014

During a routine inspection

Catherine House Surgery is a GP practice providing primary care services for people in and around Totnes, Devon. It provides services from Catherine House Surgery, The Plains, Totnes, Devon TQ9 5HA where we carried out an announced inspection on 8 July 2014. It also has a branch surgery held at St Peters Church, Harbertonford Devon TQ9 7TA, this is offered one day a week and by appointment only.

When the practice is closed patients are advised to contact the Out of Hours service, which is operated by a different provider.

As part of our inspection we spoke with five patients after their appointments and a member of the patient participation group (PPG). This group acts a voice for patients at the practice. We received seven comments cards completed by patients. Both verbal and written comments were all very positive about the practice and the care and treatment patients received from the GPs and nursing team. We also spoke with the senior partner who was also the registered manager of the practice, three other GPs, two practice nurses, a healthcare assistant, the practice manager and reception and administration staff.

Catherine House Surgery provided safe clinical care for its patients. Staff knew how to safeguard vulnerable patients and children, and how to monitor and manage risk for patients. The practice was effective in meeting the wide range of patients’ needs and it supported the continuity of patient care through established working relationships with other agencies and services such as social services. Patients experienced person-centred and holistic care and treatment. Staff were caring and compassionate towards their patients treating them with dignity and respect, giving them time and making them feel they were being heard.

Catherine House Surgery was not meeting the requirements relating to staff recruitment. Full and relevant checks were not always completed for all staff prior to employment at the practice.

There were areas at the practice that needed improvement to ensure administrative processes and procedures were up to date and safe:

Infection control practice did not always follow the practice policy and procedure.

Records of staff registrations, insurance and training information were not kept up to date

Audits cycles were not always dated, full and complete with actions for outcomes.

Roles and lines of accountability were not well-defined.

The nurses and GPs were trained in providing care and treatment for medical conditions affecting older people. The practice recalled patients with long term health conditions for annual health checks to provide a more holistic approach to care and treatment and to avoid patients with more than one long term condition being called separately for each condition. The nursing team provided annual checks and health action plans for patients with learning disabilities. Effective systems were in place for GPs to seek advice and support if they had concerns about a child or a vulnerable adult and to raise a safeguarding alert if they felt the child or vulnerable adult was in danger of significant harm.

The practice offered longer opening hours one evening a week to accommodate working patients’ needs and an open access service for two hours every morning for all patients.  The open access was particularly popular with parents of young children, patients with mental ill health, and patients in vulnerable circumstances who may have poor access to primary care.