• Doctor
  • GP practice

Kirklands Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

111 Copnor Road, Copnor, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO3 5AF (023) 9266 3368

Provided and run by:
Kirklands Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Kirklands Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Kirklands Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

13 July 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Kirklands Surgery on 13 July 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

29 November 2017

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection 08 January 2015 – Good)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive/focused inspection at Kirklands Surgery on 29 November 2017.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.

  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.

  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.

  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

  • The practice made reasonable adjustments when patients found it hard to access services. For example, the practice employed a community nurse practitioner who undertook health checks for patients with long term conditions, who were unable to attend appointments at the practice, within their own home.

  • The practice used a text message system to engage patients with services that helped them to live healthier lives.

  • The practice offered patients minor surgery during extended hours appointments and held flu clinics on Saturdays for patients who would not be able to attend during the week.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to review processes for identifying patients who are also carers.

  • Continue to ensure clinical auditing processes evidence positive outcomes for patients.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

8 January 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out a comprehensive inspection of Kirklands Surgery on 8 January 2015, which is situated at 111 Copner Road, Copner, Portsmouth PO3 5AF.

Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing well-led, effective, caring and responsive services. It was also good for providing services for all population groups.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • A range of appointments were available for patients. A standard appointment time was 15 minutes and 10 minutes for same day appointments.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider should

  • Consider logging verbal complaints received by the practice in order to assist in identifying themes.
  • Have a system in place for managing the risk of Legionella.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice