• Doctor
  • GP practice

Wickham Park Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2 Manor Road, West Wickham, Kent, BR4 9PS (020) 8777 1293

Provided and run by:
Wickham Park Surgery

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 20 January 2026 to 28 January 2026. Wickham Park Surgery is a GP practice and delivers services to 5530 people under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that 70.83% of patients are white, 11.68% Black, 9.14% Asian, 5.67% Mixed and 2.67% Other. information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 9th decile (9 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff generally understood and managed risks. However, improvements were required with the management of medical emergencies equipment. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Where people didn’t have capacity, and staff took decisions about the patient’s care in their best interest, they involved those people who were important to the patient in the decision.

 

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The service supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

14 June 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wickham Park Surgery on 14 June 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. However, not all staff were aware of the location of the practice emergency equipment and medicines.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had adequate facilities and was equipped to treat patients and meet their needs. However, the premises had restricted capacity and was in need of updating and redecoration. The provider was awaiting the outcome of negotiations with NHS England regarding the possibility of relocation to purpose-built premises in 2018.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

There were areas where the provider should make improvements.

  • The provider should keep a record of batch numbers of blank prescriptions placed in printers.
  • The provider should ensure all staff are aware of the location of emergency medicines and equipment.
  • The provider should consider completing an action plan to identify priority issues to be addressed in relation to the practice facilities if negotiations for relocation are unsuccessful and to cover the interim period, before the move takes place, if negotiations are successful.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice