• Doctor
  • GP practice

Wickham Park Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2 Manor Road, West Wickham, Kent, BR4 9PS (020) 8777 1293

Provided and run by:
Wickham Park Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Wickham Park Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Wickham Park Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

16 August 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Wickham Park Surgery on 16 August 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

14 June 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Wickham Park Surgery on 14 June 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment. However, not all staff were aware of the location of the practice emergency equipment and medicines.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had adequate facilities and was equipped to treat patients and meet their needs. However, the premises had restricted capacity and was in need of updating and redecoration. The provider was awaiting the outcome of negotiations with NHS England regarding the possibility of relocation to purpose-built premises in 2018.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

There were areas where the provider should make improvements.

  • The provider should keep a record of batch numbers of blank prescriptions placed in printers.
  • The provider should ensure all staff are aware of the location of emergency medicines and equipment.
  • The provider should consider completing an action plan to identify priority issues to be addressed in relation to the practice facilities if negotiations for relocation are unsuccessful and to cover the interim period, before the move takes place, if negotiations are successful.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice