• Doctor
  • GP practice

Hetton Group Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Francis Way, Hetton-Le-Hole, Houghton Le Spring, Tyne and Wear, DH5 9EZ (0191) 526 1177

Provided and run by:
Hetton Group Practice

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 6 October to 24 October 2025. On 21 October 2025 we carried out remote clinical searches of the patient’s records, and on 23 October 2025, we carried out a visit to the practice. Hetton Group Practice is a GP practice and delivers service to approximately 11,900 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The provider of this service is a partnership of 5 GP partners, although at the time of our assessment only 3 were registered with CQC.

Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 2nd decile (2 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. The management of medicines could be improved, and we were concerned about the location of the emergency medication.

The service did not always make sure people’s care and treatment were effective. We saw that oversight of long-term conditions could be improved. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The service supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

22 September 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at the Hetton Group Practice on 22 September 2015. Overall, the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and report incidents and near misses;
  • Risks to patients and staff were assessed and well managed;
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and responsibilities;
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs. Information about how to complain was available and easy to understand;
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in decisions about their care and treatment;
  • The majority of patients who provided us with feedback did not raise any concerns over access to appointments. Results from the National GP Patient Survey of the practice showed that patient satisfaction with access to appointments, practice opening hours and appointment waiting times, was broadly in line with local Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and national averages. Staff continuously monitored the practice's appointment system to provide better responsiveness for their patients;
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt well-supported by the management team. Good governance arrangements were in place;
  • Staff had a clear vision for the development of the practice and were committed to providing their patients with good quality care. This was demonstrated by the steps staff were taking to develop additional services to meet the needs of their patients.

However, there was an area of practice where the provider needs to make improvements. Importantly the provider should:

  • The practice needs to assess and consider what emergency medications are appropriate for doctors to carry with them when carrying out routine home visits for use in acute situations.

We identified outstanding areas of practice:

  • Staff had supported a local organisation (Sunderland People First) to carry out a check of how well their practice met the health needs of patients with learning disabilities. The practice had prepared an action plan to help address those areas where it had been identified that staff could make improvements. Staff had already taken action to implement their action plan and this had led to improvements in the services provided to patients with learning disabilities;
  •  The practice offered a full range of immunisations for children who attended their child health and immunisation clinics. On the basis of the nationally reported data available to the Care Quality Commission (CQC), we saw that, where comparisons allowed, the delivery of the majority of childhood immunisations was mostly higher, when compared to the overall percentages for children receiving the same immunisations within the local CCG area.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice