• Doctor
  • GP practice

Ashley Surgery

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

School Lane, Ashley, Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 4LF (01630) 672225

Provided and run by:
Ashley Surgery

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 22 September 2026.

Ashley Surgery is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 5,157 people under a contract held with NHS England. According to the latest available data, the ethnic make-up of the service area is approximately 96% White, 2% Asian, 1.2% Mixed, 0.5% Black and 0.3% Other. Information published by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows deprivation within the service population group is in the 8th decile (8 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the service population is relative to others.

This was a focused assessment. We undertook this assessment due to the length of time since our last assessment. We assessed 12 quality statements from across all 5 key questions. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

Staff kept facilities clean and maintained equipment appropriately to ensure people were kept safe. They assessed and managed the risk of infection well and took steps to control the risk of it spreading. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Staff mostly prescribed, stored and administered medicines appropriately. However, we found a very small number of areas where processes needed to be improved. For example, escalation processes when people failed to comply with the required monitoring for high-risk medicines.

Staff supported people to live healthier lives, monitoring their care and treatment to ensure they received positive and consistent outcomes. Staff mostly followed the latest evidence and good practice when providing care and treatment.

The service was exceptional at treating people with kindness, empathy and compassion and in how they respected people’s privacy and dignity.

The service was exceptional at ensuring people could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they needed it. Leaders and staff were alert to discrimination and inequality that could disadvantage groups of people who used the service and sought ways to address any barriers.

The service had a clear vision and strategy, which considered the needs of the people who used their service and the wider community. Staff understood their individual roles and responsibilities. Leaders accounted for the actions, behaviours and performance of staff through clear and effective governance processes.

16 November 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Ashley Surgery on 16 November 2016. Overall the practice is rated as outstanding.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents and near misses.

  • The practice used innovative and proactive methods to improve patient outcomes, working with other local providers to share best practice. For example, a member of staff had completed the ‘Walk Leader’ training and set up a monthly ‘Walking for Health’ group to reduce social isolation. In collaboration with the health visiting service, there were plans to start a pram walk for rurally isolated new mothers.

  • Feedback from patients about their care was consistently positive.

  • The practice worked closely with other organisations and with the local community in planning how services were provided to ensure that they meet patients’ needs. For example, a practice nurse studying for a diploma in frailty worked with Age UK North Staffordshire to provide the Senior Plus service, providing extra support to older patients to help them to continue to live independently at home.

  • The practice implemented suggestions for improvements and made changes to the way it delivered services as a consequence of feedback from patients and from the patient participation group. For example, to overcome problems for older adults living in a rural community in accessing phlebotomy services, the practice provided a blood test monitoring service for patients on a long-term medicine used to prevent the formation of blood clots.

  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.

  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by the management.

  • The practice had strong and visible clinical and managerial leadership and governance arrangements.

We saw two areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice was proactive and effective in reducing the number of emergency hospital admissions and A&E attendances for all population groups. Comparison of data for 2014/15 and 2015/16 demonstrated an ongoing downward trend in the number of A&E admissions.

  • A health care assistant (HCA) at the practice offered smoking cessation support for patients. A 74% smoking cessation rate had been achieved at four weeks with a 56% cessation rate at 12 weeks. Due to the effectiveness of this service, the HCA had been presented with an award from the ‘Time to Quit NHS Stop Smoking Service’ for the ‘Most Consistent Quit Smoking Advisor’ in North Staffordshire for 2014/15.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice