• Doctor
  • GP practice

Manor and Park Group Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

204 Harborough Avenue, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S2 1QU (0114) 272 7768

Provided and run by:
Manor Park Medical Centre

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Manor and Park Group Practice on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Manor and Park Group Practice, you can give feedback on this service.

29 July 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive follow up inspection at Manor and Park Group Practice on 29 July 2021. Overall, the practice is rated as good. The rating for each key question is:

Safe - Good

Effective - Good

Caring - Good

Responsive – Requires Improvement

Well-led - Good

Following our previous inspection on 10 December 2019, the practice was rated requires improvement overall and for the key questions responsive and well-led. It was rated good for safe, effective and caring services. The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Manor and Park Group Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a comprehensive follow up inspection which covered all key questions including areas where breaches of regulation and ‘shoulds’ were identified in the previous inspection.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing and by sending staff a short questionnaire to complete.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider.
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected.
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and requires improvement for all population groups.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs. However, attainment for the management of several long term conditions, childhood immunisation and cervical cytology screening fell below local and national averages.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Patient feedback with regard to access had shown some improvement since the previous inspection, although patients still reported difficulty getting through to the practice by telephone.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centered care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Continue to follow the action plan to improve access, particularly by telephone to the practice and in relation to patient satisfaction in general.
  • Implement a system to monitor tasks on the clinical system in a timely manner.
  • Continue to improve data for management of long term conditions and screening which were below local and national averages.
  • Implement a system to monitor registration with the professional bodies for clinical staff on a regular basis.
  • Follow policies and risk assessments to ensure staff receive training in infection, prevention and control (IPC) and fire safety at appropriate intervals.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

10 December 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Manor Park Medical Centre on 10 December 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

We decided to undertake an inspection of this service following our annual review of the information available to us, including information provided by the practice. This inspection looked at the following key questions:

  • Are services at this location safe?
  • Are services at this location effective?
  • Are services at this location caring?
  • Are services at this location responsive?
  • Are services at this location well led?

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • wwhat we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as requires improvement overall with requires improvement in responsive and well led and requires improvement for all population groups.

We rated this practice requires improvement in responsive because:

  • Patients had extreme difficulty accessing care and treatment and reported they were not able to get through easily to the practice by telephone.
  • The provider was aware of patient feedback from complaints. However, this had not driven adequate change to improve access for patients.

We rated the practice requires improvement in well led because:

  • Risk assessments and actions to mitigate risks with regard to staff levels and the number of staff answering the phone and appointment numbers was not effective.

We rated the practice as good for providing safe, effective and caring services because:

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality care. The provider was aware of access issues and had taken steps to address it. However, at the time of the inspection patient feedback was overwhelming about difficulties accessing an appointment and the changes implemented had not addressed this adequately.

The areas where the provider must make improvements are:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

(Please see the specific details on action required at the end of this report).

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Ensure the recruitment information recorded for all members of staff is in line with Regulation 19, Schedule 3 of the Health and Social Care Act.
  • Ensure all staff are trained to the appropriate safeguarding level for their role as recommended in the intercollegiate safeguarding guidance (Safeguarding children and young people: roles and competencies for healthcare staff).
  • Implement a system for checking the medical fridges when the nurse is absent and review Public Health England guidance with regard to availability of a second thermometer in one of the medical fridges at the main site.
  • Take action to review and follow their complaints policy to reflect NHS complaints guidance.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

16 May 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Manor Park Medical Centre on 16 May 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

19 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We found patients were fully involved in decisions relating to their treatment and care. We found patients privacy and dignity was maintained whilst attending the practice. Patient's overall experience when attending the practice had been positive. For example patients told us 'It's very good [at the practice]', 'The receptionists are nice ' good service' and 'Excellent care from the doctor ' they take time to see you and explain things.'

We found processes were in place to safeguard patients from the risks of abuse.

We conducted a tour of the premises and found it was clean and tidy. There were systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.

We found staff were adequately supported because they received regular training sessions and an annual appraisal.

We found there were effective systems to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that patients receive.