• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Mountfield Surgery Also known as Dr Patrick Keane & Dr Ann Robinson

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

55 Mountfield Road, Finchley, London, N3 3NR (020) 8346 4271

Provided and run by:
The Mountfield Surgery

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Mountfield Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Mountfield Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

28 December 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about The Mountfield Surgery on 28 December 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

8 November 2018

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection 13 August 2015– Good)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Good

We carried out an announced inspection at Mountfield Surgery on 8 November 2017 as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.

  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.

  • All staff were actively engaged in activities to monitor and improve quality and outcomes. For example, a

  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

  • The practice provided a Monday to Friday morning non appointment based walk in service. People spoke positively about how this allowed them to access care and treatment in a way and at a time that suited them.

  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

  • We saw examples of compassionate, inclusive and effective leadership.

We saw two areas of outstanding practice:

  • One of the practice nurses was an experienced, former district nurse. She coordinated care for elderly, housebound and vulnerable patients and had a proactive programme of scheduled home visits which integrated with the local hospital’s admission avoidance team. A monthly vulnerable patients multidisciplinary team meeting fed into this programme and was also used to review safeguarding concerns.

  • The practice provided a Monday to Friday morning non appointment based walk in service. Patients spoke positively about how they could access appointments in a way and at a time that suited them.

    Clinicians spoke positively about the impact of both of these initiatives on the practice’s avoidable admissions performance (which was in the lowest quartile for the CCG area). For example, CCG wide average performance on avoidable admissions was 8.12 patients per 1,000 compared with the practice’s performance of 2.73 patients per 1,000 (as of November 2017).

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Introduce a programme of formal clinical audit, so as to drive a more proactive structured and evidence based approach to improving patient outcomes.

  • Continue to monitor recent actions taken to widen its patient participation group membership.

  • Monitor recently introduced improvements to how learning from significant events is shared.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

13 August 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Mountfield Surgery on 13 August 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Incidents were recorded and dealt with appropriately, as well as monitored.
  • Risks to patients and staff were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care. The practice was accessible, with a walk-in session every morning, and urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

  • The practice was supportive of young people with complex mental health needs. The GPs had provided their email addresses to a number of young patients, and advised these patients that they were contactable at any time. The GPs were working closely with these patients, as well as with colleagues from the mental health sector to provide support and continuity of care.

There were areas of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • Ensure that information is available to patients about chaperoning and translation services.
  • Ensure all staff receive infection control training commensurate with their role.
  • Ensure clinical staff have annual updates on basic life support training.
  • Put a system in place to monitor the movement and use of prescription pads in the practice.

Please note that when referring to information throughout this report, for example any reference to the Quality and Outcomes Framework data, this relates to the most recent information available to the CQC at that time.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice