The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Dr Polkinghorn and Partners Also known as The Market Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Warehouse Lane, Wath-on-Dearne, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S63 7RA (01709) 870150

Provided and run by:
Dr Polkinghorn and Partners

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Dr Polkinghorn and Partners on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Dr Polkinghorn and Partners, you can give feedback on this service.

8 June 2019

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Dr Polkinghorn and Partners on 8 June 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

18 November 2015

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Polkinghorn and Partners on 18 November 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. However, information on escalating a complaint was not routinely provided to complainants.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management.
  • The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • An analysis of all significant events received over an extended period was not undertaken to enable patterns and trends to be identified.

  • There were no records to evidence the fire alarm had been tested regularly to ensure this was in working order.

  • Information about the Ombudsman was not routinely provided to complainants.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice